Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26322087›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2015

Predicting reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation and death in post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a comparison between artificial neural networks and logistic regression models.

Renata G Mendes, César R de Souza, Maurício N Machado, Paulo R Correa, Luciana Di Thommazo-Luporini, Ross Arena, Jonathan Myers, Ednaldo B Pizzolato, Audrey Borghi-Silva

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03371628 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Use of Electrical Impedance Tomography in Evaluating the Effects of Noninvasive Ventilation in the Post-Operative Cardiac Surgery: Controlled and Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de PernambucoRan2017 to 2018Enrolled26ConditionsThoracic SurgeryArmsNon invasive ventilation
NCT05348109 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Decision Support System Software in Extraction and Anchorage Planning Among Adult Patients Using Computer Algorithm

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCairo UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsCases That Need Extraction of Teeth in Orthodontics, Anchorage PlanningArmsWell finished cases
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Renata G MendesDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
César R de SouzaComputer Department, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Maurício N MachadoHospital de Base of São José do Rio Preto, Faculty of Medicine, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
Paulo R CorreaHospital de Base of São José do Rio Preto, Faculty of Medicine, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
Luciana Di Thommazo-LuporiniComputer Department, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Ross ArenaDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA.
Jonathan MyersCardiology Division, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Ednaldo B PizzolatoComputer Department, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Audrey Borghi-SilvaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.

Funding

Senior Research Career ScientistIK6RX002477 · VA · VETERANS ADMIN PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYS · PI MYERS, JONATHAN N. · 2017 to 2025
–
RRD VA IK6 RX002477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn coronary artery bypass (CABG) surgery, the common complications are the need for reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) and death. Thus, a reliable model for the prognostic evaluation of those particular outcomes is a worthwhile pursuit. The existence of such a system would lead to better resource planning, cost reductions and an increased ability to guide preventive strategies. The aim of this study was to compare different methods - logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) - in accomplishing this goal. MATERIAL AND

methodsSubjects undergoing CABG (n = 1315) were divided into training (n = 1053) and validation (n = 262) groups. The set of independent variables consisted of age, gender, weight, height, body mass index, diabetes, creatinine level, cardiopulmonary bypass, presence of preserved ventricular function, moderate and severe ventricular dysfunction and total number of grafts. The PMV was also an input for the prediction of death. The ability of ANN to discriminate outcomes was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the results were compared using a multivariate LR.

resultsThe ROC curve areas for LR and ANN models, respectively, were: for reintubation 0.62 (CI: 0.50-0.75) and 0.65 (CI: 0.53-0.77); for PMV 0.67 (CI: 0.57-0.78) and 0.72 (CI: 0.64-0.81); and for death 0.86 (CI: 0.79-0.93) and 0.85 (CI: 0.80-0.91). No differences were observed between models.

conclusionsThe ANN has similar discriminating power in predicting reintubation, PMV and death outcomes. Thus, both models may be applicable as a predictor for these outcomes in subjects undergoing CABG.

Indexed as

computer applicationscoronary artery bypass graftsoutcomespostoperative care

Identifiers

PMID26322087
PMCPMC4548023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.