Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26322082›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2015

Objectives and methodology of Romanian SEPHAR II Survey. Project for comparing the prevalence and control of cardiovascular risk factors in two East-European countries: Romania and Poland.

Maria Dorobantu, Oana-Florentina Tautu, Roxana Darabont, Silviu Ghiorghe, Elisabeta Badila, Minca Dana, Minodora Dobreanu, Ilarie Baila, Marcin Rutkowski, Tomasz Zdrojewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Galectin-3 in Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria DorobantuCardiology Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania.
Oana-Florentina TautuCardiology Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania.
Roxana DarabontCardiology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania.
Silviu GhiorgheInternal Medicine Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania.
Elisabeta BadilaInternal Medicine Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania.
Minca DanaPublic Health National Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
Minodora DobreanuClinical Biochemistry Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Târgu Mureş, Romania.
Ilarie BailaSynLab Romania, Bucharest, Romania.
Marcin RutkowskiDepartment of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Tomasz ZdrojewskiDepartment of Hypertension and Diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionComparing results of representative surveys conducted in different East-European countries could contribute to a better understanding and management of cardiovascular risk factors, offering grounds for the development of health policies addressing the special needs of this high cardiovascular risk region of Europe. The aim of this paper was to describe the methodology on which the comparison between the Romanian survey SEPHAR II and the Polish survey NATPOL 2011 results is based. MATERIAL AND

methodsSEPHAR II, like NATPOL 2011, is a cross-sectional survey conducted on a representative sample of the adult Romanian population (18 to 80 years) and encompasses two visits with the following components: completing the study questionnaire, blood pressure and anthropometric measurements, and collection of blood and urine samples.

resultsFrom a total of 2223 subjects found at 2860 visited addresses, 2044 subjects gave written consent but only 1975 subjects had eligible data for the analysis, accounting for a response rate of 69.06%. Additionally we excluded 11 subjects who were 80 years of age (NATPOL 2011 included adult subjects up to 79 years). Therefore, the sample size included in the statistical analysis is 1964. It has similar age groups and gender structure as the Romanian population aged 18-79 years from the last census available at the moment of conducting the survey (weight adjustments for epidemiological analyses range from 0.48 to 8.7).

conclusionsSharing many similarities, the results of SEPHAR II and NATPOL 2011 surveys can be compared by a proper statistical method offering crucial information regarding cardiovascular risk factors in a high-cardiovascular risk European region.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasecross-sectional studyepidemiologyhypertensionmetabolic disorders

Identifiers

PMID26322082
PMCPMC4548029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.