Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26322022›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Whole genome protein microarrays for serum profiling of immunodominant antigens of Bacillus anthracis.

Karen E Kempsell, Stephen P Kidd, Kuiama Lewandowski, Michael J Elmore, Sue Charlton, Annemarie Yeates, Hannah Cuthbertson, Bassam Hallis, Daniel M Altmann, Mitch Rogers and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genomic Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen E KempsellPublic Health England Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Stephen P KiddPublic Health England Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Kuiama LewandowskiPublic Health England Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Michael J ElmorePublic Health England Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Sue CharltonPublic Health England Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Annemarie YeatesPublic Health England Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Hannah CuthbertsonPublic Health England Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Bassam HallisPublic Health England Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Daniel M AltmannDepartment of Medicine, University College London, Hammersmith Hospital London, UK.
Mitch RogersPublic Health England Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Pierre WattiauDepartment of Bacterial Diseases, CODA-CERVA (Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre) Brussels, Belgium.
Rebecca J IngramCentre for Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast Belfast, UK.
Tim BrooksPublic Health England Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Richard VipondPublic Health England Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Public Health England · GBQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A commercial Bacillus anthracis (Anthrax) whole genome protein microarray has been used to identify immunogenic Anthrax proteins (IAP) using sera from groups of donors with (a) confirmed B. anthracis naturally acquired cutaneous infection, (b) confirmed B. anthracis intravenous drug use-acquired infection, (c) occupational exposure in a wool-sorters factory, (d) humans and rabbits vaccinated with the UK Anthrax protein vaccine and compared to naïve unexposed controls. Anti-IAP responses were observed for both IgG and IgA in the challenged groups; however the anti-IAP IgG response was more evident in the vaccinated group and the anti-IAP IgA response more evident in the B. anthracis-infected groups. Infected individuals appeared somewhat suppressed for their general IgG response, compared with other challenged groups. Immunogenic protein antigens were identified in all groups, some of which were shared between groups whilst others were specific for individual groups. The toxin proteins were immunodominant in all vaccinated, infected or other challenged groups. However, a number of other chromosomally-located and plasmid encoded open reading frame proteins were also recognized by infected or exposed groups in comparison to controls. Some of these antigens e.g., BA4182 are not recognized by vaccinated individuals, suggesting that there are proteins more specifically expressed by live Anthrax spores in vivo that are not currently found in the UK licensed Anthrax Vaccine (AVP). These may perhaps be preferentially expressed during infection and represent expression of alternative pathways in the B. anthracis "infectome." These may make highly attractive candidates for diagnostic and vaccine biomarker development as they may be more specifically associated with the infectious phase of the pathogen. A number of B. anthracis small hypothetical protein targets have been synthesized, tested in mouse immunogenicity studies and validated in parallel using human sera from the same study.

Indexed as

anthraxantibodyimmunologyinfectionmicroarrayprotein

Identifiers

PMID26322022
PMCPMC4534840
OpenAlexW1585800923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.