Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26321910›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2015

Activity dependent CAM cleavage and neurotransmission.

Katherine Conant, Megan Allen, Seung T Lim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Threat Memory Reminder Under Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Inhibitor Doxycycline Globally Reduces Subsequent Memory Plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A Role for Matrix Metalloproteases in Antidepressant Efficacy.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine ConantDepartment of Neuroscience and Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center Washington, DC, USA.
Megan AllenDepartment of Neuroscience and Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center Washington, DC, USA.
Seung T LimDepartment of Neuroscience and Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center Washington, DC, USA.
Georgetown University Medical Center · USGeorgetown University · US

Funding

Predoctoral Training in Intergrative NeuroscienceT32NS041231 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Ludise Malkova, Ashley S VanMeter · 2001 to 2026
$6.8M
Training in Neural Injury &PlasticityT32NS041218 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MARK P BURNS, Kathleen Anne Maguire-Zeiss · 2001 to 2026
$3.5M
PAR-1 Signaling and HANDR01NS083410 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI CONANT, KATHERINE E, MAGUIRE-ZEISS, KATHLEEN ANNE · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083410NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041218NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatially localized proteolysis represents an elegant means by which neuronal activity dependent changes in synaptic structure, and thus experience dependent learning and memory, can be achieved. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that matrix metalloproteinase and adamalysin activity is concentrated at the cell surface, and emerging evidence suggests that increased peri-synaptic expression, release and/or activation of these proteinases occurs with enhanced excitatory neurotransmission. Synaptically expressed cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) could therefore represent important targets for neuronal activity-dependent proteolysis. Several CAM subtypes are expressed at the synapse, and their cleavage can influence the efficacy of synaptic transmission through a variety of non-mutually exclusive mechanisms. In the following review, we discuss mechanisms that regulate neuronal activity-dependent synaptic CAM shedding, including those that may be calcium dependent. We also highlight CAM targets of activity-dependent proteolysis including neuroligin and intercellular adhesion molecule-5 (ICAM-5). We include discussion focused on potential consequences of synaptic CAM shedding, with an emphasis on interactions between soluble CAM cleavage products and specific pre- and post-synaptic receptors.

Indexed as

adhesionCAMdendritic spineglutamatemetalloproteasesMMP

Identifiers

PMID26321910
PMCPMC4531370
OpenAlexW1521173707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.