Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26321898›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2015

An optimization formulation for characterization of pulsatile cortisol secretion.

Rose T Faghih, Munther A Dahleh, Emery N Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Characterizing Alterations in Cortisol Secretion During Cardiac Surgery.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Loop analysis of blood pressure/volume homeostasis.PLoS computational biology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rose T FaghihDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA ; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA ; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, USA ; Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA.
Munther A DahlehDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA ; Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA ; Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA ; Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA.
Emery N BrownDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA ; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA, USA ; Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA ; Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortisol is released to relay information to cells to regulate metabolism and reaction to stress and inflammation. In particular, cortisol is released in the form of pulsatile signals. This low-energy method of signaling seems to be more efficient than continuous signaling. We hypothesize that there is a controller in the anterior pituitary that leads to pulsatile release of cortisol, and propose a mathematical formulation for such controller, which leads to impulse control as opposed to continuous control. We postulate that this controller is minimizing the number of secretory events that result in cortisol secretion, which is a way of minimizing the energy required for cortisol secretion; this controller maintains the blood cortisol levels within a specific circadian range while complying with the first order dynamics underlying cortisol secretion. We use an ℓ0-norm cost function for this controller, and solve a reweighed ℓ1-norm minimization algorithm for obtaining the solution to this optimization problem. We use four examples to illustrate the performance of this approach: (i) a toy problem that achieves impulse control, (ii) two examples that achieve physiologically plausible pulsatile cortisol release, (iii) an example where the number of pulses is not within the physiologically plausible range for healthy subjects while the cortisol levels are within the desired range. This novel approach results in impulse control where the impulses and the obtained blood cortisol levels have a circadian rhythm and an ultradian rhythm that are in agreement with the known physiology of cortisol secretion. The proposed formulation is a first step in developing intermittent controllers for curing cortisol deficiency. This type of bio-inspired pulse controllers can be employed for designing non-continuous controllers in brain-machine interface design for neuroscience applications.

Indexed as

circadian rhythmcortisol secretionendocrine controlmathematical modelingpulsatile control

Identifiers

PMID26321898
PMCPMC4531247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.