Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26321475›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2015

Understanding and valuing the broader health system benefits of Uganda's national Human Resources for Health Information System investment.

Julia Driessen, Dykki Settle, David Potenziani, Kate Tulenko, Twaha Kabocho, Ismail Wadembere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia DriessenUniversity of Pittsburgh, Crabtree A614, 130 De Soto St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA. driessen@pitt.edu.
Dykki SettleIntraHealth International, 6340 Quadrangle Drive, Suite 200, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA. dsettle@intrahealth.org.
David PotenzianiIntraHealth International, 6340 Quadrangle Drive, Suite 200, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA. dpotenziani@intrahealth.org.
Kate TulenkoCapacityPlus, IntraHealth International, 1776 Eye Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20006, USA. ktulenko@intrahealth.org.
Twaha KabochoPwani Health Informatics, Pwani University, Kilifi, Kenya. twaha@me.com.
Ismail WadembereIntraHealth International, Kampala, Uganda. iwadembere@intrahealth.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address the need for timely and comprehensive human resources for health (HRH) information, governments and organizations have been actively investing in electronic health information interventions, including in low-resource settings. The economics of human resources information systems (HRISs) in low-resource settings are not well understood, however, and warrant investigation and validation. CASE DESCRIPTION: This case study describes Uganda's Human Resources for Health Information System (HRHIS), implemented with support from the US Agency for International Development, and documents perceptions of its impact on the health labour market against the backdrop of the costs of implementation. Through interviews with end users and implementers in six different settings, we document pre-implementation data challenges and consider how the HRHIS has been perceived to affect human resources decision-making and the healthcare employment environment. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: This multisite case study documented a range of perceived benefits of Uganda's HRHIS through interviews with end users that sought to capture the baseline (or pre-implementation) state of affairs, the perceived impact of the HRHIS and the monetary value associated with each benefit. In general, the system appears to be strengthening both demand for health workers (through improved awareness of staffing patterns) and supply (by improving licensing, recruitment and competency of the health workforce). This heightened ability to identify high-value employees makes the health sector more competitive for high-quality workers, and this elevation of the health workforce also has broader implications for health system performance and population health.

conclusionsOverall, it is clear that HRHIS end users in Uganda perceived the system to have significantly improved day-to-day operations as well as longer term institutional mandates. A more efficient and responsive approach to HRH allows the health sector to recruit the best candidates, train employees in needed skills and deploy trained personnel to facilities where there is real demand. This cascade of benefits can extend the impact and rewards of working in the health sector, which elevates the health system as a whole.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth PersonnelHealth WorkforceHumansInformation SystemsInservice TrainingInterviews as TopicLicensureOrganizational Case StudiesPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingUganda

Identifiers

PMID26321475
PMCPMC4553943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.