ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2015
Shift and adapt: the costs and benefits of karyotype variations.
Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards a unified model of aneuploid karyotype dynamics.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Review of the Microbial Spectrum of Mixed Respiratory Fungal Infections.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Review
- Segmental copy number amplifications are more stable than aneuploidies in the absence of selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Evolutionary responses to increased opportunity for sexual selection in yeast.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Evolutionary responses to increased opportunity for sexual selection in yeast.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Energetics of whole genome doubling and genomic instability.Cancer letters · 2025Review
- Resource presentation dictates genetic and phenotypic adaptation in yeast.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- The distribution of beneficial mutational effects between two sister yeast species poorly explains natural outcomes of vineyard adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Gene-by-environment interactions influence the fitness cost of gene copy-number variation in yeast.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Gene-by-environment interactions influence the fitness cost of gene copy-number variation in yeast.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Review
- Determining mating type and ploidy in Rhodotorula toruloides and its effect on growth on sugars from lignocellulosic biomass.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Karyon: a computational framework for the diagnosis of hybrids, aneuploids, and other nonstandard architectures in genome assemblies.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Acquisition of cross-azole tolerance and aneuploidy in Candida albicans strains evolved to posaconazole.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Bursts of Genomic Instability Potentiate Phenotypic and Genomic Diversification inFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Fungal evolution: cellular, genomic and metabolic complexity.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020Article
- Molecular signatures of aneuploidy-driven adaptive evolution.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Proteins that physically interact with the phosphatase Cdc14 in Candida albicans have diverse roles in the cell cycle.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Incompatibilities in Mismatch Repair GenesGenetics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Variation is the spice of life or, in the case of evolution, variation is the necessary material on which selection can act to enable adaptation. Karyotypic variation in ploidy (the number of homologous chromosome sets) and aneuploidy (imbalance in the number of chromosomes) are fundamentally different than other types of genomic variants. Karyotypic variation emerges through different molecular mechanisms than other mutational events, and unlike mutations that alter the genome at the base pair level, rapid reversion to the wild type chromosome number is often possible. Although karyotypic variation has long been noted and discussed by biologists, interest in the importance of karyotypic variants in evolutionary processes has spiked in recent years, and much remains to be discovered about how karyotypic variants are produced and subsequently selected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.