SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2015
Safety and efficacy of digoxin: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and controlled trial data.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 114 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
114 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 333 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies of Pharmacological Interventions: A Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Synthesis methods used to combine observational studies and randomised trials in published meta-analyses.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024Guideline
- Guideline
- Clinical practice guidelines for diagnostic and treatment of the chronic heart failure.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Guideline
- Comparative efficacy of different drugs in acute heart failure with renal dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of digoxin on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation with and without heart failure: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and 12 meta-analyses.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of Digoxin Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of clinical profiles between takotsubo syndrome and acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Factors associated with relapses in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Digoxin-mortality: randomized vs. observational comparison in the DIG trial.European heart journal · 2019Pooled it
- Mortality among patients due to adverse drug reactions that lead to hospitalization: a meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- Is echocardiography valid and reproducible in patients with atrial fibrillation? A systematic review.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2017Pooled it
- Association between prediabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Pooled it
- The treatment gap in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: a systematic review of evidence-based prescribing in practice.Heart failure reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Patient-Reported Outcomes for Quality of Life Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Increased All-Cause Mortality Associated With Digoxin Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis.Medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Quantification and impact of circulating cardiotonic steroids in the RATE-AF randomised trial of patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.BMC medicine · 2025Trial
54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo clarify the impact of digoxin on death and clinical outcomes across all observational and randomised controlled trials, accounting for study designs and methods. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Comprehensive literature search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, reference lists, and ongoing studies according to a prospectively registered design ( PROSPERO: CRD42014010783), including all studies published from 1960 to July 2014 that examined treatment with digoxin compared with control (placebo or no treatment). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Unadjusted and adjusted data pooled according to study design, analysis method, and risk of bias.
main outcome measuresPrimary outcome (all cause mortality) and secondary outcomes (including admission to hospital) were meta-analysed with random effects modelling.
results52 studies were systematically reviewed, comprising 621,845 patients. Digoxin users were 2.4 years older than control (weighted difference 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 3.6), with lower ejection fraction (33% v 42%), more diabetes, and greater use of diuretics and anti-arrhythmic drugs. Meta-analysis included 75 study analyses, with a combined total of 4,006,210 patient years of follow-up. Compared with control, the pooled risk ratio for death with digoxin was 1.76 in unadjusted analyses (1.57 to 1.97), 1.61 in adjusted analyses (1.31 to 1.97), 1.18 in propensity matched studies (1.09 to 1.26), and 0.99 in randomised controlled trials (0.93 to 1.05). Meta-regression confirmed that baseline differences between treatment groups had a significant impact on mortality associated with digoxin, including markers of heart failure severity such as use of diuretics (P=0.004). Studies with better methods and lower risk of bias were more likely to report a neutral association of digoxin with mortality (P<0.001). Across all study types, digoxin led to a small but significant reduction in all cause hospital admission (risk ratio 0.92, 0.89 to 0.95; P<0.001; n=29,525).
conclusionsDigoxin is associated with a neutral effect on mortality in randomised trials and a lower rate of admissions to hospital across all study types. Regardless of statistical analysis, prescription biases limit the value of observational data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.