Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26319981›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2016

Antibacterial TAP-mimic electrospun polymer scaffold: effects on P. gingivalis-infected dentin biofilm.

Maria Tereza P Albuquerque, Joshua D Evans, Richard L Gregory, Marcia C Valera, Marco C Bottino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Self-Supplying HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A novel patient-specific three-dimensional drug delivery construct for regenerative endodontics.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Tereza P AlbuquerqueDepartment of Biomedical and Applied Sciences, Indiana University School of Dentistry (IUSD), 1121 W. Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Joshua D EvansDepartment of Biomedical and Applied Sciences, Indiana University School of Dentistry (IUSD), 1121 W. Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Richard L GregoryDepartment of Biomedical and Applied Sciences, Indiana University School of Dentistry (IUSD), 1121 W. Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Marcia C ValeraGraduate Program in Restorative Dentistry (Endodontics), São José dos Campos Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, 12245-000, Brazil.
Marco C BottinoDepartment of Biomedical and Applied Sciences, Indiana University School of Dentistry (IUSD), 1121 W. Michigan Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. mbottino@iu.edu.

Funding

A Novel Multilayered Membrane for Periodontal RegenerationK08DE023552 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BOTTINO, MARCO C · 2013 to 2017
$716k
NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE023552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study sought to investigate, in vitro, the effects of a recently developed triple antibiotic paste (TAP)-mimic polymer nanofibrous scaffold against Porphyromonas gingivalis-infected dentin biofilm. MATERIALS AND

methodsDentin specimens (4 × 4 × 1 mm(3)) were prepared from human canines. The specimens were sterilized, inoculated with P. gingivalis (ATCC 33277), and incubated for 1 week to allow for biofilm formation. Infected dentin specimens were exposed for 3 days to the following treatments: antibiotic-free polydioxanone scaffold (PDS, control), PDS + 25 wt% TAP [25 mg of each antibiotic (metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and minocycline) per mL of the PDS polymer solution], or a saturated TAP-based solution (50 mg of each antibiotic per mL of saline solution). In order to serve as the negative control, infected dentin specimens were left untreated (bacteria only). To determine the antimicrobial efficacy of the TAP-mimic scaffold, a colony-forming unit (CFU) per milliliter (n = 10/group) measurement was performed. Furthermore, additional specimens (n = 2/group) were prepared to qualitatively study biofilm inhibition via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistics were performed, and significance was set at the 5% level.

resultsBoth the TAP-mimic scaffold and the positive control (TAP solution) led to complete bacterial elimination, differing statistically (p < 0.05) from the negative control group (bacteria only). No statistical differences were observed for CFU per milliliter data between antibiotic-free scaffolds (2.7 log10 CFU/mL) and the negative control (5.9 log10 CFU/mL).

conclusionsThe obtained data revealed significant antimicrobial properties of the novel PDS-based TAP-mimic scaffold against an established P. gingivalis-infected dentin biofilm. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Collectively, the data suggest that the proposed nanofibrous scaffold might be used as an alternative to the advocated clinical gold standard (i.e., TAP) for intracanal disinfection prior to regenerative endodontics.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsCiprofloxacinDentinDrug CombinationsHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMetronidazoleMinocyclineNanofibersPolydioxanonePolymersPorphyromonas gingivalisAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinDrug CombinationsMetronidazoleMinocyclinePolydioxanonePolymersAntibioticDisinfectionElectrospinningEndodonticsNanofibersScaffold

Identifiers

PMID26319981
PMCPMC4913351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.