ArticleClinical oral investigations2016
Inhibition of demineralization around the enamel-dentin/restoration interface after dentin pretreatment with TiF4 and self-etching adhesive systems.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bonding durability and remineralizing efficiency of orthodontic adhesive containing titanium tetrafluoride: an invitro study.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Novel Nanocomposite Inhibiting Caries at the Enamel Restoration Margins in an In Vitro Saliva-Derived Biofilm Secondary Caries Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Effects ofRSC advances · 2019Article
- Comparison of antimicrobial effects of titanium tetrafluoride, chlorhexidine, xylitol and sodium fluoride onElectronic physician · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the inhibition of demineralization around enamel-dentin/restoration interface after dentin pretreatment with 2.5% titanium tetrafluoride (TiF4). MATERIALS AND
methodsForty dental class V cavities at the cementoenamel junction were distributed into four groups (n = 10), according to the presence or absence of TiF4 and to the adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond/CL and Adper EasyOne/AD), and restored with a resin composite. A dynamic pH cycling model was used to induce the development of artificial caries lesions. After sectioning the dental blocks, Knoop microhardness tests were performed at different depths (20, 40, and 60 μm from the occlusal margin of the restoration) and at different distances (100, 200, and 300 μm from the adhesive interface). Repeated measures three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test were used (α = 0.05).
resultsFor enamel, there were no differences in the microhardness values for CL, AD, and TiF4-AD at depths, regardless of the distances. Considering each depth, there were no significant differences among treatments. For dentin, ANOVA showed no significant interaction among the independent variables treatment*distance*depth (p = 0.994), no significant interaction between treatment*depth (p = 0.722), no significant interaction between treatment*distance (p = 0.265), no significant interaction between depth*distance (p = 0.365), and no significant effect on treatment (p = 0.151), depth (p = 0.067), or distance (p = 0.251).
conclusionsDentin pretreatment of the cavity walls with TiF4 before self-etching adhesive systems was not effective in inhibiting demineralization around the enamel-dentin/restoration interfaces. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The mechanism of incorporating fluoride in enamel and dentin of the cavity walls to inhibit demineralization around restorations seems ineffective when using TiF4 as a dentin pretreatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.