Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26319710›Full record

Trial reportJournal of interpersonal violence2017

Risk of Intimate Partner Violence and Relationship Conflict Following Couple-Based HIV Prevention Counseling: Results From the Harlem River Couples Project.

James M McMahon, Ruth Chimenti, Nicole Trabold, Theresa Fedor, Mona Mittal, Stephanie Tortu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of interpersonal violence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

James M McMahon1 University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA.
Ruth Chimenti2 University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Nicole Trabold1 University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA.
Theresa Fedor1 University of Rochester Medical Center, NY, USA.
Mona Mittal3 University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Stephanie Tortu4 Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
University of Rochester Medical Center · USLouisiana State University · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Virology/Immunology CoreP30AI078498 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DEWHURST, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2018
$14.6M
GRADUATE TRAINING IN DEMOGRAPHYT32HD007242 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MICHEL GUILLOT · 1985 to 2026
$6.6M
MARYLAND POPULATION RESEARCH CENTERR24HD041041 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI RENDALL, MICHAEL S. · 2001 to 2016
$6.6M
Couples HIV Intervention Randomized Controlled TrialR01DA015641 · NIDA · NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT &RES INSTITUTES · PI MCMAHON, JAMES M · 2003 to 2006
$2.8M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI078498NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041041NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007242NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterosexual transmission of HIV often occurs in the context of intimate sexual partnerships. There is mounting evidence that couple-based HIV prevention interventions may be more effective than individual-based interventions for promoting risk reduction within such relationships. Yet, concerns have been raised about the safety of couple-based prevention approaches, especially with regard to the risk of intimate partner violence against women. Although several international studies have examined the potential for adverse consequences associated with couple-based interventions, with inconsistent results, there is little data from U.S. studies to shed light on this issue. The current study analyzed data from a randomized trial conducted in New York City with 330 heterosexual couples to examine whether participation in couple-based or relationship-focused HIV counseling and testing (HIV-CT) interventions resulted in an increased likelihood of post-intervention breakups, relationship conflicts, or emotional, physical, or sexual abuse, compared with standard individual HIV-CT. Multinomial logistic regression was used to model the odds of experiencing change in partner violence from baseline to follow-up by treatment condition. A high prevalence of partner-perpetrated violence was reported by both male and female partners across treatment conditions, but there was no conclusive evidence of an increase in relationship dissolution or partner violence subsequent to participation in either the couple-based HIV-CT intervention or relationship-focused HIV-CT intervention compared with controls. Qualitative data collected from the same participants support this interpretation. HIV prevention interventions involving persons in primary sexual partnerships should be sensitive to relationship dynamics and the potential for conflict, and take precautions to protect the safety of both male and female participants.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalFamily CharacteristicsRisk Reduction BehaviorAdultCounselingFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleNew York Citycouple-based counselingHIV preventionintimate partner violence

Identifiers

PMID26319710
PMCPMC4769677
OpenAlexW1893164036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.