Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26319522›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2015

Prevalence and intensity of Alaria alata (Goeze, 1792) in water frogs and brown frogs in natural conditions.

Cécile Patrelle, Julien Portier, Damien Jouet, Daniel Delorme, Hubert Ferté

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Comprehensive Review ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Other Schistosomatoidea and Diplostomoidea.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Predicting the risk ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2022
    Article
  7. A comparison of detection methods ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The occurrence ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cécile PatrelleEA 4688 - USC Anses « VECPAR », UFR de Pharmacie, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51 rue Cognacq-Jay, 51096, Reims, France. cecile.patrelle@gmail.com.
Julien PortierEA 4688 - USC Anses « VECPAR », UFR de Pharmacie, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51 rue Cognacq-Jay, 51096, Reims, France.
Damien JouetEA 4688 - USC Anses « VECPAR », UFR de Pharmacie, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51 rue Cognacq-Jay, 51096, Reims, France.
Daniel DelormeOffice National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Direction nord-Est, 57160, Moulins les Metz, France.
Hubert FertéEA 4688 - USC Anses « VECPAR », UFR de Pharmacie, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51 rue Cognacq-Jay, 51096, Reims, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 15 years, the mesocercariae of Alaria alata have frequently been reported in the wild boar during routine Trichinella inspections made compulsory for the trade of venison meat in Europe. If these studies have focused primarily on mesocercariae isolated from meat, few works have been done so far to understand the circulation of the parasite in natural conditions especially in the intermediate hosts. This study focuses on the second intermediate hosts of this parasite assessing the suitability of two amphibian groups-brown frogs and water frogs sensu lato-for mesocercarial infection on an area where A. alata has already been identified in water snails and wild boars. During this study, both groups showed to be suitable for mesocercarial infection, with high prevalence and parasite burdens. Prevalence was higher in the brown frog group (56.9 versus 11.54 % for water frogs) which would indicate that it is a preferential group for infection on the study area, though reasons for this remain to be investigated. No significant difference among prevalences was observed between tadpoles and frogs. This study, the first focusing on A. alata in these amphibians in Europe, provides further information on circulation of this parasite in natura.

Indexed as

AnimalsEuropeLarvaMeatPlatyhelminthsPrevalenceRanidaeTrichinellaAlaria alataBrown frogMesocercariaeWater frog

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.