Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26319520›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2015

Natural infection of free-range chickens with the ascarid nematode Toxocara sp.

Danielle R Campos-da-Silva, Jeanne S da Paz, Viviane R Fortunato, Marcus A V Beltrame, Luis C P Valli, Fausto E L Pereira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle R Campos-da-SilvaGraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vila Velha University, Rua Comissário José Dantas de Melo, n°21, Boa Vista, 29102-770, Vila Velha, ES, Brazil.
Jeanne S da PazGraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vila Velha University, Rua Comissário José Dantas de Melo, n°21, Boa Vista, 29102-770, Vila Velha, ES, Brazil.
Viviane R FortunatoGraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vila Velha University, Rua Comissário José Dantas de Melo, n°21, Boa Vista, 29102-770, Vila Velha, ES, Brazil.
Marcus A V BeltrameSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Vila Velha University, Rua Comissário José Dantas de Melo 21, Boa Vista, 29102-770, Vila Velha, ES, Brazil.
Luis C P ValliGraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vila Velha University, Rua Comissário José Dantas de Melo, n°21, Boa Vista, 29102-770, Vila Velha, ES, Brazil.
Fausto E L PereiraGraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vila Velha University, Rua Comissário José Dantas de Melo, n°21, Boa Vista, 29102-770, Vila Velha, ES, Brazil. felp@ndi.ufes.br.
Universidade Vila Velha · BRUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human toxocariasis may be acquired by eating raw chicken liver. However, there are no reports on the prevalence of natural infection of chickens with Toxocara. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of anti-Toxocara antibodies as indicators of natural infection with Toxocara, in free-range chickens from Espírito Santo State, Brazil. An ELISA test with secretory and excretory Toxocara canis antigens was used. Negative controls were 20 industrial chickens reared in a high hygiene standard environment. Positive control serum was from a chicken infected with embryonated eggs of T. canis. Sera were adsorbed with Ascaridia galli extract to reduce cross-reactivity. Cut-off was the mean plus four times the standard deviation of optical density (OD) in negative group. One hundred and fifty-seven sera from free-range chicken were investigated. Results showed 58.5% of the chickens were positive with ELISA test; 12.7% had OD over the positive control and may be considered as true infected chickens. The results between the cut-off and the positive control may include infections with low titers of antibodies or may represent serum scar of past infection or may be the result of cross-reaction with other nematodes rather than A. galli which is used for the adsorption of sera. In conclusion, high prevalence of Toxocara sp. antibodies demonstrates natural infection of free-range chickens from Espírito Santo State which may represent a risk of infection with this nematode in people who have the habit of eating raw or undercooked chicken meat or viscera. The results also suggest that chickens may be useful as sentinels to detect soil contaminated with Toxocara eggs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, HelminthBrazilChickensCross ReactionsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansPoultry DiseasesPrevalenceToxocaraToxocariasisAntibodies, HelminthAnti-Toxocara antibodiesChickenFree-range chickenToxocara

Identifiers

PMID26319520
OpenAlexW1918690224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.