Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26319493›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2015

Analysis of radiation therapy in a model of triple-negative breast cancer brain metastasis.

DeeDee Smart, Alejandra Garcia-Glaessner, Diane Palmieri, Sarah J Wong-Goodrich, Tamalee Kramp, Brunilde Gril, Sudhanshu Shukla, Tiffany Lyle, Emily Hua, Heather A Cameron and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Between Prometheus and Thanatos: Reflections on Intracardiac Injection Models for Metastasis in Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Animal models of brain metastasis.Neuro-oncology advances · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Radiation research · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

DeeDee SmartRadiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Building 10, Room B3B69, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. smartd@mail.nih.gov.
Alejandra Garcia-GlaessnerRadiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Building 10, Room B3B69, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Diane PalmieriWomen's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bldg 37, Rm. 1126, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Sarah J Wong-GoodrichSection on Neuroplasticity, NIMH, NIH, 35 Convent Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Tamalee KrampRadiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Building 10, Room B3B69, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Brunilde GrilWomen's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bldg 37, Rm. 1126, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Sudhanshu ShuklaRadiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Building 10, Room B3B69, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Tiffany LyleWomen's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bldg 37, Rm. 1126, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Emily HuaWomen's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bldg 37, Rm. 1126, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Heather A CameronSection on Neuroplasticity, NIMH, NIH, 35 Convent Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Kevin CamphausenRadiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Building 10, Room B3B69, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Patricia S SteegWomen's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bldg 37, Rm. 1126, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. steegp@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Neurogenesis In The Adult BrainZIAMH002784 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI CAMERON, HEATHER A · 2009 to 2025
$29.7M
Tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer brain metastasis after brain radiationZIABC011330 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SMART, DEEDEE · 2010 to 2017
$1.5M
Molecular Analysis of Breast Cancer Metastasis to the BrainZ01BC010538 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI STEEG, PATRICIA SCHRIVER · 2003 to 2008
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010538Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cancer patients with brain metastases are treated with radiation therapy, yet this modality has not yet been meaningfully incorporated into preclinical experimental brain metastasis models. We applied two forms of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) to the brain-tropic 231-BR experimental brain metastasis model of triple-negative breast cancer. When compared to sham controls, WBRT as 3 Gy × 10 fractions (3 × 10) reduced the number of micrometastases and large metastases by 87.7 and 54.5 %, respectively (both p < 0.01); whereas a single radiation dose of 15 Gy × 1 (15 × 1) was less effective, reducing metastases by 58.4 % (p < 0.01) and 47.1 % (p = 0.41), respectively. Neuroinflammation in the adjacent brain parenchyma was due solely to a reaction from metastases, and not radiotherapy, while adult neurogenesis in brains was adversely affected following both radiation regimens. The nature of radiation resistance was investigated by ex vivo culture of tumor cells that survived initial WBRT ("Surviving" cultures). The Surviving cultures surprisingly demonstrated increased radiosensitivity ex vivo. In contrast, re-injection of Surviving cultures and re-treatment with a 3 × 10 WBRT regimen significantly reduced the number of large and micrometastases that developed in vivo, suggesting a role for the microenvironment. Micrometastases derived from tumor cells surviving initial 3 × 10 WBRT demonstrated a trend toward radioresistance upon repeat treatment (p = 0.09). The data confirm the potency of a fractionated 3 × 10 WBRT regimen and identify the brain microenvironment as a potential determinant of radiation efficacy. The data also nominate the Surviving cultures as a potential new translational model for radiotherapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCranial IrradiationFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansMiceMice, NudeRadiation ToleranceRadiotherapy DosageTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysBrainBreastCancerMetastasisRadiationRadiosensitivity

Identifiers

PMID26319493
PMCPMC7743910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.