Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26319144›Full record

ReviewInternational ophthalmology2015

Biologic therapy for refractory scleritis: a new treatment perspective.

Tania Sales de Alencar de Fidelix, Luis Antonio Vieira, Denise de Freitas, Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surgical induced necrotizing scleritis following intraocular lens replacement.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Is there a role for TNFα blockade in ANCA-associated vasculitis and glomerulonephritis?Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2017
    Review
  15. [Diagnosis and treatment of episcleritis and scleritis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2016
    Review
  16. Management of noninfectious scleritis.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tania Sales de Alencar de FidelixEvidence-Based Health Department, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Barão do Triunfo, 156/232, São Paulo, SP, 04602-000, Brazil. fidelixtania@gmail.com.
Luis Antonio VieiraOphthalmology Department, UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Denise de FreitasOphthalmology Department, UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Virginia Fernandes Moça TrevisaniEvidence-Based Health Department, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Rua Barão do Triunfo, 156/232, São Paulo, SP, 04602-000, Brazil.
Fundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scleritis is an umbrella term for a heterogeneous group of ocular diseases that can be associated with autoimmune or systemic disorders. The purpose of this article was to review the literature regarding the use of biologic drugs to treat refractory scleritis. A search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS electronic databases was conducted, and the reference lists of published articles were hand-searched. No language filters were used. This search strategy yielded no randomized trials of the use of biologic therapies to treat scleritis; only case reports and retrospective studies were retrieved. These studies suggest that monoclonal antibodies (infliximab and adalimumab) are superior to the soluble TNF receptor fusion protein etanercept for the treatment of scleritis in patients that do not respond to corticosteroids and/or to immunosuppressive treatment. Rituximab seems to be the best option for scleritis associated with vasculitis.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiological TherapyCertolizumab PegolEtanerceptHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInfliximabScleritisTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAdalimumabAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCertolizumab PegolEtanerceptImmunosuppressive AgentsInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAdalimumabCertolizumabEtanerceptInfliximabRituximab

Identifiers

PMID26319144
OpenAlexW1939839245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.