Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26318734›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2015

Impact of referral templates on the quality of referrals from primary to secondary care: a cluster randomised trial.

Henrik Wåhlberg, Per Christian Valle, Siri Malm, Ann Ragnhild Broderstad

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01470963 (Practical Health Co-operation - a Randomised Controlled Intervention Study. The Impact of a Referral Template on Quality of Care and Health Care Co-operation Between Primary and Secondary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01470963 nacompletednot on this map

Practical Health Co-operation - a Randomised Controlled Intervention Study. The Impact of a Referral Template on Quality of Care and Health Care Co-operation Between Primary and Secondary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital of North NorwayRan2011 to 2014Enrolled500ConditionsReferral, Quality of Health CareArmsImplementation of referral template
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Electronic checklists improve referral letters in gastroenterology: a randomized vignette survey.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2018
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henrik WåhlbergDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway. henrik.wahlberg@uit.no.
Per Christian ValleUniversity Hospital of North Norway Harstad, St. Olavsgate 70, 9480, Harstad, Norway. per.christian.valle@unn.no.
Siri MalmUniversity Hospital of North Norway Harstad, St. Olavsgate 70, 9480, Harstad, Norway. siri.malm@unn.no.
Ann Ragnhild BroderstadUniversity Hospital of North Norway Harstad, St. Olavsgate 70, 9480, Harstad, Norway. ann.ragnhild.broderstad@uit.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe referral letter is an important document facilitating the transfer of care from a general practitioner (GP) to secondary care. Hospital doctors have often criticised the quality and content of referral letters, and the effectiveness of improvement efforts remains uncertain.

methodsA cluster randomised trial was conducted using referral templates for patients in four diagnostic groups: dyspepsia, suspected colorectal cancer, chest pain and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The GP surgery was the unit of randomisation. Of the 14 surgeries served by the University Hospital of North Norway Harstad, seven were randomised to the intervention group. Intervention GPs used referral templates soliciting core clinical information when initiating a new referral in one of the four clinical areas. Intermittent surgery visits by study personnel were also carried out. A total of 500 patients were included, with 281 in the intervention and 219 in the control arm. Referral quality scoring was performed by three blinded raters. Data were analysed using multi-level regression modelling. All analyses were conducted on intention-to-treat basis.

resultsIn the final multilevel model, referrals in the intervention group scored 18% higher (95% CI (11%, 25%), p < 0.001) on the referral quality score than the control group. The model also showed that board certified GPs and GPs in larger surgeries produced referrals of significantly higher quality.

conclusionIn this study, the dissemination of referral templates coupled with intermittent surgery visits produced higher quality referrals.

trial registrationThis trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration number is NCT01470963.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareSecondary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCluster AnalysisDyspepsiaFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Identifiers

PMID26318734
PMCPMC4553012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.