Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26318487›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2015

Combined anterior and rotational knee laxity measurements improve the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

C Mouton, D Theisen, T Meyer, H Agostinis, C Nührenbörger, D Pape, R Seil

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07013019 (Reference Values for Knee Rotational Amplitudes in a Population of Athletes), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07013019 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Reference Values for Knee Rotational Amplitudes in a Population of Athletes

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur MerRan2025 to 2026Enrolled482ConditionsKnee Ligament InjuryArmsMeasures of overall (internal+external) knee rotational amplitudes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C MoutonSports Medicine Research Laboratory, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
D TheisenSports Medicine Research Laboratory, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
T MeyerInstitute of Sports and Preventive Medicine, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
H AgostinisSports Medicine Research Laboratory, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
C NührenbörgerSports Clinic, Centre Hospitalier of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
D PapeSports Medicine Research Laboratory, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
R SeilSports Medicine Research Laboratory, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. rseil@yahoo.com.
Luxembourg Institute of Health · LUCentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LUSaarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study analysed whether associating the side-to-side difference in displacement and the slope of the load-displacement curve of anterior and rotational knee laxity measurements would improve the instrumental diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures and help to detect different types of ACL tears.

methodsAnterior and rotational knee laxity was measured in 128 patients with an arthroscopically confirmed ACL injury and 104 healthy controls. Side-to-side differences were determined for three variables in anterior laxity: anterior displacement at 200 N (ATD200), primary compliance from 30 to 50 N (PCA) and secondary compliance from 100 to 200 N (SCA). Furthermore, four variables in rotational laxity were considered: internal and external rotation at 5 N m (IR5/ER5) and compliance from 2 to 5 N m (C IR/C ER). Receiver operating characteristic curves allowed to determine thresholds, specificities and sensitivities to detect ACL lesions, based on single variables considered and combinations thereof.

resultsSensitivity and specificity reached, respectively, 75 and 95 % for ATD200 (threshold: 1.2 mm) and 38 and 95 % for IR5 (threshold: 3.2°). If either two out of the three variables were positive for anterior laxity or both IR5 and C IR were positive, 81 % of patients were identified without a false positive. All patients for whom ATD200 was >3.7 mm, PCA > 48 μm/N or SCA > 17.5 µm/N had ACL remnants that were either totally resorbed or healed on the posterior cruciate ligament.

conclusionCombined instrumented anterior and rotational knee laxity measurements have excellent diagnostic value for ACL injury, provided that several measurements be considered concomitantly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level III.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAdultArthrometry, ArticularCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityKnee InjuriesMaleRotationSensitivity and SpecificityAnterior cruciate ligamentAnterior knee laxityCombined laxity measurementsInjury diagnosisRotational knee laxity

Identifiers

PMID26318487
OpenAlexW1817601240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.