Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26318466›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2015

Risk factors of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among health care staff in a teaching hospital in central Saudi Arabia.

Ohoud S Al-Humaidan, Talat A El-Kersh, Raid A Al-Akeel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global prevalence of macrolide-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nasal Carriage Rate ofInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  8. Prevalence and Clindamycin Resistance Profile ofInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nasal Carriage and Methicillin Resistance ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Methicillin-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Methicillin-resistantNew microbes and new infections · 2019
    Article
  19. Complex Clonal Diversity ofBioMed research international · 2018
    Article
  20. Molecular characterization ofCaspian journal of internal medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ohoud S Al-HumaidanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail. oalhumaidan@ksu.edu.sa.
Talat A El-Kersh
Raid A Al-Akeel
King Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate possible risk factors of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) nasal carriage associated with various health troubles among healthcare workers (HCWs) at King Khalid University Hospital (KKUH).

methodThis prospective study was conducted between May 2012 and January 2013 in KKUH, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 200 nasal swabs were collected from HCWs. Identification was carried out based on morphology, Gram stain, catalase and coagulase test, Staphaurex PlusH test, chromogenic medium, oxacillin, and cefoxitin test using disc diffusion method. Characterization was carried out using disk diffusion method and E-test. Polymerase chain reaction was carried out to confirm using GeneXpert® Dx System (Cepheid) to detect mecA gene.

resultsAmong the 200 isolates, 80 (40%) were S. aureus carriers, and 36 (18%) of all HCWs were identified as MRSA carriers. There was a significant difference of S. aureus according to gender with male carriers (p=0.012), occupation particularly among nurses (p=0.006), and duration of working years in the hospital among 4-6 years group (p=0.002). Moreover, none of the risk factors assessed were significantly associated with the carriage rate of MRSA (p greater than 0.05).

conclusionThe current study revealed that nursing staff was the potential colonizers of S. aureus and MRSA compared with other HCWs. Regular screening of carriers is required for prevention of nosocomial infections.

Indexed as

Hospitals, TeachingPersonnel, HospitalAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarrier StateFemaleHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedNasal CavityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSaudi ArabiaStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26318466
PMCPMC4613633
OpenAlexW2163815748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.