Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26318373›Full record

Trial reportJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2017

Patient and Family Caregivers' Experiences of Living With a Jejunostomy Feeding Tube After Surgery for Esophagogastric Cancer.

Vanessa Halliday, Melanie Baker, Anne L Thomas, David Bowrey

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Utility and outcomes of routine jejunostomy placement following oesophagectomy.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Nutritional literacy of patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer based on Nutbeam's health literacy model: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  11. A scoping review of best practices in home enteral tube feeding.Primary health care research & development · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The experience of family caregivers of patients receiving home nasogastric tube feeding in China: A descriptive qualitative study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa Halliday1 The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, UK.
Melanie Baker2 Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Anne L Thomas3 Department of Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
David Bowrey2 Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0610-22480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJejunostomy feeding tubes (JFTs) can be used to provide nutrition support to patients who have had surgery for esophagogastric cancer. Although previous research reports how patients cope with a gastrostomy tube, little is known about the impact of having a JFT. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore how patients and their informal caregivers experience living with a JFT in the first months following surgery.

methodsParticipants were purposively sampled from a cohort of patients recruited to a trial investigating home enteral nutrition vs standard care after esophagogastric surgery for cancer. The sampling framework considered age, sex, and marital status. Informal caregivers were also invited to participate. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymized. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes related to living with a JFT.

resultsFifteen patient interviews were conducted; 8 also included a family caregiver. Analysis of the data resulted in 2 main themes: "challenges" and "facilitators" when living with a JFT. While "physical effects," "worries" and "impact on routine" were the main challenges, "support," "adaptation" and "perceived benefit" were what motivated continuation of the intervention.

conclusionFindings suggest that participants coped well with a JFT, describing high levels of compliance with stoma care and the feeding regimen. Nonetheless, disturbed sleep patterns and stoma-related problems proved troublesome. A better understanding of these practical challenges, from the patient and family caregiver perspective, should guide healthcare teams in providing proactive support to avoid preventable problems.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalEnteral NutritionJejunostomyAgedBody Mass IndexCaregiversCohort StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsStomach Neoplasmsenteral accessenteral nutritionhome nutrition supportnutrition support practiceoncologysurgery

Identifiers

PMID26318373
PMCPMC5534339
OpenAlexW1706684665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.