Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26318186›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2015

[Urinary tract infections in the elderly].

Klaus Friedrich Becher, Ingo Klempien, Andreas Wiedemann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Klaus Friedrich BecherAbteilung Geriatrie und Frührehabilitation, HELIOS Hanseklinikum Stralsund, Große Parower Straße 47-54, 18437, Stralsund, Deutschland. klaus.becher@helios-kliniken.de.
Ingo KlempienAbteilung für Klinische Hygiene und Infektiologie, HELIOS Hanseklinikum Stralsund, Große Parower Straße 47-54, 18437, Stralsund, Deutschland.
Andreas WiedemannUrologische Abteilung, Lehrstuhl für Geriatrie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus im Diakoniewerk Ruhr, Universität Witten, Pferdebachstr. 27-43, 58455, Witten, Deutschland.
University of Applied Sciences Stralsund · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute infection of the urinary tract is one of the most commonly encountered bacterial infections in the frail elderly population and is responsible for substantial morbidity and recurrent infections with antibiotic resistance. Although generally considered to be self-limiting without treatment or easily treated with a short antibiotic regime, urinary tract infections (UTIs) often have a dramatic history, associated with incomplete resolution and frequent recurrence. The biological complexity of the infections combined with a dramatic rise in antibiotic-resistant pathogens highlight the need for an anticipating strategy for therapy necessary for a rapid recovery. The first crucial step is the classification in asymptomatic bacteriuria or complicated pyelonephritis, on which the decision for the intensity of treatment and diagnostic effort is based. For the selection of empiric antibiotic therapy, knowledge about the predominant uropathogens as well as local resistance patterns is important. In this manner, most urinary tract infections in the elderly can be treated without greater expense.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsCatheter-Related InfectionsEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleSymptom AssessmentTreatment OutcomeUrinary CathetersUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAgedAntibioticsCatheters, indwellingDeliriumUrinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID26318186
OpenAlexW1125248740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.