Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26318155›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2015

SNP Assay Development for Linkage Map Construction, Anchoring Whole-Genome Sequence, and Other Genetic and Genomic Applications in Common Bean.

Qijian Song, Gaofeng Jia, David L Hyten, Jerry Jenkins, Eun-Young Hwang, Steven G Schroeder, Juan M Osorno, Jeremy Schmutz, Scott A Jackson, Phillip E McClean and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fine Mapping of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fine mapping of the unique Ur-11 gene conferring broad resistance to the rust pathogen of common bean.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Biofortification of common bean (Food and energy security · 2023
    Review
  19. A robust SNP-haplotype assay forFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Qijian SongUSDA-ARS, Soybean Genomics and Improvement Lab, Beltsville, Maryland 20705 Qijian.Song@ars.usda.gov.
Gaofeng JiaUSDA-ARS, Soybean Genomics and Improvement Lab, Beltsville, Maryland 20705.
David L HytenUSDA-ARS, Soybean Genomics and Improvement Lab, Beltsville, Maryland 20705.
Jerry JenkinsHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama 35806.
Eun-Young HwangDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742.
Steven G SchroederUSDA-ARS, Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory, Animal and Natural Resources Institute, Beltsville, Maryland 20705.
Juan M OsornoDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58102.
Jeremy SchmutzHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama 35806 Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, California 94598.
Scott A JacksonCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.
Phillip E McCleanDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58102.
Perry B CreganUSDA-ARS, Soybean Genomics and Improvement Lab, Beltsville, Maryland 20705.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 992,682 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was identified as ideal for Illumina Infinium II BeadChip design after sequencing a diverse set of 17 common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) varieties with the aid of next-generation sequencing technology. From these, two BeadChips each with >5000 SNPs were designed. The BARCBean6K_1 BeadChip was selected for the purpose of optimizing polymorphism among market classes and, when possible, SNPs were targeted to sequence scaffolds in the Phaseolus vulgaris 14× genome assembly with sequence lengths >10 kb. The BARCBean6K_2 BeadChip was designed with the objective of anchoring additional scaffolds and to facilitate orientation of large scaffolds. Analysis of 267 F2 plants from a cross of varieties Stampede × Red Hawk with the two BeadChips resulted in linkage maps with a total of 7040 markers including 7015 SNPs. With the linkage map, a total of 432.3 Mb of sequence from 2766 scaffolds was anchored to create the Phaseolus vulgaris v1.0 assembly, which accounted for approximately 89% of the 487 Mb of available sequence scaffolds of the Phaseolus vulgaris v0.9 assembly. A core set of 6000 SNPs (BARCBean6K_3 BeadChip) with high genotyping quality and polymorphism was selected based on the genotyping of 365 dry bean and 134 snap bean accessions with the BARCBean6K_1 and BARCBean6K_2 BeadChips. The BARCBean6K_3 BeadChip is a useful tool for genetics and genomics research and it is widely used by breeders and geneticists in the United States and abroad.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageGenome, PlantPolymorphism, Single NucleotideChromosome MappingGlycine maxBARCBean6K BeadChiplinkage mapmolecular markersPhaseolus vulgarisSNP

Identifiers

PMID26318155
PMCPMC4632048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.