ArticlePloS one2015
Whole Genome-Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis of a Historical Collection of Bacillus anthracis Strains from Danish Cattle.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Archival and Newly Isolated HistoricalPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- New Research on thePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Identification of the molecular characteristics ofVeterinary world · 2022Article
- Population genomics ofMicrobial genomics · 2022Article
- An Estimate of Global Anthrax Prevalence in Livestock: A Meta-analysis.Veterinary world · 2021Article
- Article
- Review: The risk of contracting anthrax from spore-contaminated soil - A military medical perspective.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2020Article
- Genetic diversity of Bacillus anthracis Ames lineage strains in China.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Genetic characterization of Bacillus anthracis strains circulating in Italy from 1972 to 2018.PloS one · 2020Article
- Genotyping and phylogenetic location of one clinical isolate of Bacillus anthracis isolated from a human in Russia.BMC microbiology · 2019Article
- Genotyping and phylogenetic placement of Bacillus anthracis isolates from Finland, a country with rare anthrax cases.BMC microbiology · 2018Article
- The reporting of a Bacillus anthracis B-clade strain in South Africa after more than 20 years.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- Discovery of a Unique Extracellular Polysaccharide in Members of the Pathogenic Bacillus That Can Co-form with Spores.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax, is known as one of the most genetically monomorphic species. Canonical single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) typing and whole-genome sequencing were used to investigate the molecular diversity of eleven B. anthracis strains isolated from cattle in Denmark between 1935 and 1988. Danish strains were assigned into five canSNP groups or lineages, i.e. A.Br.001/002 (n = 4), A.Br.Ames (n = 2), A.Br.008/011 (n = 2), A.Br.005/006 (n = 2) and A.Br.Aust94 (n = 1). The match with the A.Br.Ames lineage is of particular interest as the occurrence of such lineage in Europe is demonstrated for the first time, filling an historical gap within the phylogeography of the lineage. Comparative genome analyses of these strains with 41 isolates from other parts of the world revealed that the two Danish A.Br.008/011 strains were related to the heroin-associated strains responsible for outbreaks of injection anthrax in drug users in Europe. Eight novel diagnostic SNPs that specifically discriminate the different sub-groups of Danish strains were identified and developed into PCR-based genotyping assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.