Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26317872›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Overuse and Underuse of Antiosteoporotic Treatments According to Highly Influential Osteoporosis Guidelines: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Spain.

Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno, Isabel Hurtado, José Sanfélix-Genovés, Cristóbal Baixauli-Pérez, Clara L Rodríguez-Bernal, Salvador Peiró

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Global under- and overprescribing of drugs-a scoping review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriel Sanfélix-GimenoHealth Services Research Unit, Center for Public Health Research (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain.
Isabel HurtadoHealth Services Research Unit, Center for Public Health Research (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain.
José Sanfélix-GenovésHealth Services Research Unit, Center for Public Health Research (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain; Fundación de Investigación del Hospital Clínico Universitario-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA. Valencia, Spain.
Cristóbal Baixauli-PérezHealth Services Research Unit, Center for Public Health Research (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain.
Clara L Rodríguez-BernalHealth Services Research Unit, Center for Public Health Research (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain.
Salvador PeiróHealth Services Research Unit, Center for Public Health Research (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inappropriate prescribing of antiosteoporotic medications has been observed; however, the joint study of both overuse and underuse has barely been attempted. Spain, with its high utilization rates, constitutes a good example to assess differences in over and under use according to diverse highly-influential osteoporosis guidelines (HIOG) worldwide. We used data of a population-based cross-sectional study including 824 post-menopausal women ≥50 years old living in the city of Valencia, Spain and aimed to estimate the percentage of women eligible for treatment, and the proportion of overuse and underuse of antiosteoporotic treatment according to HIOG. The prevalence of antiosteoporotic treatment in postmenopausal women ≥ 50 in Valencia was 20.9% (95%CI:17.6-24.4). The type of antiosteoporotic drugs prescribed varied greatly depending on the medical specialty responsible of the initial prescription. When applying the HIOG, the percentage of women 50 and over who should be treated varied from less than 9% to over 44%. In real terms, from the approximately eight million women of 50 years old and over in Spain, the number eligible for treatment would range from 0.7 to 3.8 million, depending on the guideline used. A huge proportion of inappropriate treatments was found when applying these guidelines to the Spanish population, combining a high overuse (42-78% depending on the guideline used) and underuse (7-41%). In conclusion, we found that the pharmacological management of osteoporosis in women of 50 and over in this population combines an important overuse and, to a lesser extent, underuse, although the level of inappropriateness varied strikingly depending on the CPG used. It seems urgent to reduce treatment overuse without neglecting underuse, as is urgent an attempt to reach wider agreement worldwide regarding osteoporosis management, in order to facilitate appropriate treatment and development of policies to reduce effectively treatment inappropriateness.

Indexed as

Inappropriate PrescribingAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosisPopulation SurveillancePractice Guidelines as TopicRisk FactorsSpain

Identifiers

PMID26317872
PMCPMC4552751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.