Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26317773›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Are There Age-Related Differences in the Ability to Learn Configural Responses?

Rachel Clark, Michael Freedberg, Eliot Hazeltine, Michelle W Voss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transplanting old organs promotes senescence in young recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel ClarkInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America.
Michael FreedbergInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America.
Eliot HazeltineInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America.
Michelle W VossInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America; Aging Mind and Brain Initiative (AMBI), The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States of America.
University of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age is often associated with a decline in cognitive abilities that are important for maintaining functional independence, such as learning new skills. Many forms of motor learning appear to be relatively well preserved with age, while learning tasks that involve associative binding tend to be negatively affected. The current study aimed to determine whether age differences exist on a configural response learning task, which includes aspects of motor learning and associative binding. Young (M = 24 years) and older adults (M = 66.5 years) completed a modified version of a configural learning task. Given the requirement of associative binding in the configural relationships between responses, we predicted older adults would show significantly less learning than young adults. Older adults demonstrated lower performance (slower reaction time and lower accuracy). However, contrary to our prediction, older adults showed similar rates of learning as indexed by a configural learning score compared to young adults. These results suggest that the ability to acquire knowledge incidentally about configural response relationships is largely unaffected by cognitive aging. The configural response learning task provides insight into the task demands that constrain learning abilities in older adults.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsCognitive AgingFemaleHumansLearningMaleMotor SkillsReaction TimeTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26317773
PMCPMC4552811
OpenAlexW2150835938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.