Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26317641›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Induction of Non-Targeted Stress Responses in Mammary Tissues by Heavy Ions.

Tony J C Wang, Cheng-Chia Wu, Yunfei Chai, Roy K K Lam, Nobuyuki Hamada, Shizuko Kakinuma, Yukio Uchihori, Peter K N Yu, Tom K Hei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Value of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.International journal of particle therapy · 2024
    Review
  2. Carbon ion radiation therapy in breast cancer: a new frontier.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2020
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Tony J C WangCenter for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Cheng-Chia WuCenter for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Yunfei ChaiCenter for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Roy K K LamCenter for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America; Department of Physics and Materials Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR.
Nobuyuki HamadaNational Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan; Radiation Safety Research Center, Nuclear Technology Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Tokyo, Japan.
Shizuko KakinumaNational Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
Yukio UchihoriNational Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
Peter K N YuDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR.
Tom K HeiCenter for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Columbia University · USCity University of Hong Kong · HKCentral Research Institute of Electric Power Industry · JP

Funding

THE FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS OF BYSTANDER RESPONSESP01CA049062 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HEI, TOM K. · 1990 to 2014
$21.9M
Cytoplasmic Damage and GenotoxicityR01ES012888 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HEI, TOM K. · 2004 to 2016
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA 49062NCI NIH HHS P01 CA049062NIEHS NIH HHS ES 12888NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSide effects related to radiation exposures are based primarily on the assumption that the detrimental effects of radiation occur in directly irradiated cells. However, several studies have reported over the years of radiation-induced non-targeted/ abscopal effects in vivo that challenge this paradigm. There is evidence that Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) plays an important role in modulating non-targeted effects, including DNA damages in vitro and mutagenesis in vivo. While most reports on radiation-induced non-targeted response utilize x-rays, there is little information available for heavy ions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adult female transgenic gpt delta mice were exposed to an equitoxic dose of either carbon or argon particles using the Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba (HIMAC) at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) in Japan. The mice were stratified into 4 groups of 5 animals each: Control; animals irradiated under full shielding (Sham-irradiated); animals receiving whole body irradiation (WBIR); and animals receiving partial body irradiation (PBIR) to the lower abdomen with a 1 x 1 cm2 field. The doses used in the carbon ion group (4.5 Gy) and in argon particle group (1.5 Gy) have a relative biological effectiveness equivalent to a 5 Gy dose of x-rays. 24 hours after irradiation, breast tissues in and out of the irradiated field were harvested for analysis. Induction of COX2, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), phosphorylated histone H2AX (γ-H2AX), and apoptosis-related cysteine protease-3 (Caspase-3) antibodies were examined in the four categories of breast tissues using immunohistochemical techniques. Analysis was performed by measuring the intensity of more than 20 individual microscopic fields and comparing the relative fold difference.

resultsIn the carbon ion group, the relative fold increase in COX2 expression was 1.01 in sham-irradiated group (p > 0.05), 3.07 in PBIR (p < 0.05) and 2.50 in WBIR (p < 0.05), respectively, when compared with controls. The relative fold increase in 8-OHdG expression was 1.29 in sham-irradiated (p > 0.05), 11.31 in PBIR (p < 0.05) and 11.79 in WBIR (p < 0.05), respectively, when compared with controls. A similar increase in γ-H2AX expression was found in that, compared to controls, the increase was 1.41 fold in sham-irradiated (p > 0.05), 8.41 in PBIR (p < 0.05) and 10.59 in WBIR (p < 0.05). Results for the argon particle therapy group showed a similar magnitude of changes in the various biological endpoints examined. There was no statistical significance observed in Caspase-3 expression among the 4 groups.

conclusionsOur data show that both carbon and argon ions induced non-targeted, out of field induction of COX2 and DNA damages in breast tissues. These effects may pose new challenges to evaluate the risks associated with radiation exposure and understanding radiation-induced side effects.

Indexed as

Heavy IonsStress, Physiological8-Hydroxy-2'-DeoxyguanosineAnimalsCaspase 3Cyclooxygenase 2DeoxyguanosineDNA DamageFemaleHistonesMammary Glands, AnimalMice8-Hydroxy-2'-DeoxyguanosineCaspase 3Cyclooxygenase 2Deoxyguanosinegamma-H2AX protein, mouseHistones

Identifiers

PMID26317641
PMCPMC4552651
OpenAlexW1962272759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.