Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26317617›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Fate and Phytotoxicity of CeO2 Nanoparticles on Lettuce Cultured in the Potting Soil Environment.

Xin Gui, Zhiyong Zhang, Shutong Liu, Yuhui Ma, Peng Zhang, Xiao He, Yuanyuan Li, Jing Zhang, Huafen Li, Yukui Rui and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CeOPlant molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Optimization of exogenous CeOFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Metal Homeostasis and Gas Exchange Dynamics inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects of green synthesis of sulfur nanoparticles fromPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xin GuiCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100093, China.
Zhiyong ZhangKey Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Nuclear Analytical Techniques, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Shutong LiuCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100093, China.
Yuhui MaKey Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Nuclear Analytical Techniques, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Peng ZhangKey Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Nuclear Analytical Techniques, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Xiao HeKey Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Nuclear Analytical Techniques, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Yuanyuan LiKey Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Nuclear Analytical Techniques, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Jing ZhangBeijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
Huafen LiCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100093, China.
Yukui RuiCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100093, China; Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003, United States of America.
Liming LiuCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100093, China.
Weidong CaoInstitute of Agricultural Resource and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing, 100081, China.
Institute of High Energy Physics · CNChina Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning · CNUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO2 NPs) have been shown to have significant interactions in plants. Previous study reported the specific-species phytotoxicity of CeO2 NPs by lettuce (Lactuca sativa), but their physiological impacts and vivo biotransformation are not yet well understood, especially in relative realistic environment. Butterhead lettuce were germinated and grown in potting soil for 30 days cultivation with treatments of 0, 50, 100, 1000 mg CeO2 NPs per kg soil. Results showed that lettuce in 100 mg·kg-1 treated groups grew significantly faster than others, but significantly increased nitrate content. The lower concentrations treatment had no impact on plant growth, compared with the control. However, the higher concentration treatment significantly deterred plant growth and biomass production. The stress response of lettuce plants, such as Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Peroxidase (POD), Malondialdehyde(MDA) activity was disrupted by 1000 mg·kg-1 CeO2 NPs treatment. In addition, the presence of Ce (III) in the roots of butterhead lettuce explained the reason of CeO2 NPs phytotoxicity. These findings demonstrate CeO2 NPs modification of nutritional quality, antioxidant defense system, the possible transfer into the food chain and biotransformation in vivo.

Indexed as

CeriumGene Expression Regulation, PlantLactucaMetal NanoparticlesOxidative StressPlant RootsPlant ShootsSoilceric oxideCeriumSoil

Identifiers

PMID26317617
PMCPMC4552829
OpenAlexW1895569469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.