Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26317361›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Genome-Wide Study of Structural Variants in Bovine Holstein, Montbéliarde and Normande Dairy Breeds.

Mekki Boussaha, Diane Esquerré, Johanna Barbieri, Anis Djari, Alain Pinton, Rabia Letaief, Gérald Salin, Frédéric Escudié, Alain Roulet, Sébastien Fritz and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mekki BoussahaINRA, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France; AgroParisTech, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Diane EsquerréINRA, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENSAT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENVT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France.
Johanna BarbieriINRA, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENSAT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENVT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France.
Anis DjariINRA, SIGENAE, UR 875, INRA Auzeville, BP 52627, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Alain PintonINRA, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENSAT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENVT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France.
Rabia LetaiefINRA, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France; AgroParisTech, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Gérald SalinINRA, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENSAT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENVT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France.
Frédéric EscudiéINRA, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENSAT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENVT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France.
Alain RouletINRA, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENSAT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Castanet-Tolosan, France; Université de Toulouse INPT ENVT, UMR1388 Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage, Toulouse, France.
Sébastien FritzINRA, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France; AgroParisTech, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France; Union Nationale des Coopératives Agricoles d'Elevage et d'Insémination Animale, Paris, France.
Franck SamsonINRA, UR1077, Mathématique Informatique et Génome, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Cécile GrohsINRA, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France; AgroParisTech, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Maria BernardINRA, SIGENAE, UR 875, INRA Auzeville, BP 52627, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Christophe KloppINRA, SIGENAE, UR 875, INRA Auzeville, BP 52627, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Didier BoichardINRA, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France; AgroParisTech, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Dominique RochaINRA, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France; AgroParisTech, UMR1313, Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing technologies have offered in recent years new opportunities to study genome variations. These studies have mostly focused on single nucleotide polymorphisms, small insertions or deletions and on copy number variants. Other structural variants, such as large insertions or deletions, tandem duplications, translocations, and inversions are less well-studied, despite that some have an important impact on phenotypes. In the present study, we performed a large-scale survey of structural variants in cattle. We report the identification of 6,426 putative structural variants in cattle extracted from whole-genome sequence data of 62 bulls representing the three major French dairy breeds. These genomic variants affect DNA segments greater than 50 base pairs and correspond to deletions, inversions and tandem duplications. Out of these, we identified a total of 547 deletions and 410 tandem duplications which could potentially code for CNVs. Experimental validation was carried out on 331 structural variants using a novel high-throughput genotyping method. Out of these, 255 structural variants (77%) generated good quality genotypes and 191 (75%) of them were validated. Gene content analyses in structural variant regions revealed 941 large deletions removing completely one or several genes, including 10 single-copy genes. In addition, some of the structural variants are located within quantitative trait loci for dairy traits. This study is a pan-genome assessment of genomic variations in cattle and may provide a new glimpse into the bovine genome architecture. Our results may also help to study the effects of structural variants on gene expression and consequently their effect on certain phenotypes of interest.

Indexed as

Genomic Structural VariationAnimalsAnimals, Inbred StrainsCattleDairyingGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID26317361
PMCPMC4552564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.