ArticlePLoS genetics2015
Regulation of Mutagenic DNA Polymerase V Activation in Space and Time.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic dissection of DNA damage tolerance in Bacillus subtilis: RecA and recombination functions regulate translesion synthesis.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal characterization of single-stranded DNA Intermediates after UV Irradiation: I: Post-replication gaps formed during slow growth.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Abrogation of SOS mutagenesis by themSystems · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of chromosomal DNA replication in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Hallmarks of DNA replication stress responses in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- The translesion polymerase Pol Y1 is a constitutive component of the B. subtilis replication machinery.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- The lactococcal ICE-ome encodes a repertoire of exchangeable traits with potential industrial relevance.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Escherichia coli DNA replication: the old model organism still holds many surprises.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- SOS genes are rapidly induced while translesion synthesis polymerase activity is temporally regulated.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Investigating the composition and recruitment of the mycobacterial ImuA'-ImuB-DnaE2 mutasome.eLife · 2023Article
- Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023Review
- RecF protein targeting to post-replication (daughter strand) gaps II: RecF interaction with replisomes.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Efficient plasmid transfer via natural competence in a microbial co-culture.Molecular systems biology · 2023Article
- Super-resolving microscopy reveals the localizations and movement dynamics of stressosome proteins in Listeria monocytogenes.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Defects in DNA double-strand break repair resensitize antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli to multiple bactericidal antibiotics.MicrobiologyOpen · 2022Article
- RadD is a RecA-dependent accessory protein that accelerates DNA strand exchange.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Observing protein dynamics during DNA-lesion bypass by the replisome.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Single-molecule studies of helicases and translocases in prokaryotic genome-maintenance pathways.DNA repair · 2021Review
- The rarA gene as part of an expanded RecFOR recombination pathway: Negative epistasis and synthetic lethality with ruvB, recG, and recQ.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Single-molecule localisation microscopy: accounting for chance co-localisation between foci in bacterial cells.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2021Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial regulation is often encountered as a component of multi-tiered regulatory systems in eukaryotes, where processes are readily segregated by organelle boundaries. Well-characterized examples of spatial regulation are less common in bacteria. Low-fidelity DNA polymerase V (UmuD'2C) is produced in Escherichia coli as part of the bacterial SOS response to DNA damage. Due to the mutagenic potential of this enzyme, pol V activity is controlled by means of an elaborate regulatory system at transcriptional and posttranslational levels. Using single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to visualize UmuC inside living cells in space and time, we now show that pol V is also subject to a novel form of spatial regulation. After an initial delay (~ 45 min) post UV irradiation, UmuC is synthesized, but is not immediately activated. Instead, it is sequestered at the inner cell membrane. The release of UmuC into the cytosol requires the RecA* nucleoprotein filament-mediated cleavage of UmuD→UmuD'. Classic SOS damage response mutants either block [umuD(K97A)] or constitutively stimulate [recA(E38K)] UmuC release from the membrane. Foci of mutagenically active pol V Mut (UmuD'2C-RecA-ATP) formed in the cytosol after UV irradiation do not co-localize with pol III replisomes, suggesting a capacity to promote translesion DNA synthesis at lesions skipped over by DNA polymerase III. In effect, at least three molecular mechanisms limit the amount of time that pol V has to access DNA: (1) transcriptional and posttranslational regulation that initially keep the intracellular levels of pol V to a minimum; (2) spatial regulation via transient sequestration of UmuC at the membrane, which further delays pol V activation; and (3) the hydrolytic activity of a recently discovered pol V Mut ATPase function that limits active polymerase time on the chromosomal template.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.