Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26317348›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Regulation of Mutagenic DNA Polymerase V Activation in Space and Time.

Andrew Robinson, John P McDonald, Victor E A Caldas, Meghna Patel, Elizabeth A Wood, Christiaan M Punter, Harshad Ghodke, Michael M Cox, Roger Woodgate, Myron F Goodman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Generation and Repair of Postreplication Gaps in Escherichia coli.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew RobinsonZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Centre for Synthetic Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
John P McDonaldLaboratory of Genomic Integrity, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Victor E A CaldasZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Centre for Synthetic Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Meghna PatelDepartments of Biological Sciences and Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Elizabeth A WoodDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Christiaan M PunterZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Centre for Synthetic Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Harshad GhodkeZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Centre for Synthetic Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michael M CoxDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Roger WoodgateLaboratory of Genomic Integrity, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Myron F GoodmanDepartments of Biological Sciences and Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Antoine M van OijenZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Centre for Synthetic Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

DNA Replication, Repair, and Mutagenesis In Eukaryotic And Prokaryotic CellsZIAHD001500 · NICHD · EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT · PI WOODGATE, ROGER · 2009 to 2025
$37.5M
THE BIOCHEMISTRY OF GENETIC RECOMBINATION/RECA PROTEINR01GM032335 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI COX, MICHAEL M. · 1985 to 2014
$6.8M
Biochemical Basis of SOS-Induced MutagenesisR01ES012259 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOODMAN, MYRON · 2003 to 2017
$5.6M
ERROR CORRECTION IN DNA SYNTHESIS--A BIOCHEMICAL STUDYR37GM021422 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOODMAN, MYRON · 2000 to 2009
$3.5M
Mechanisms and applications of recombinational DNA repairU01GM032335 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI COX, MICHAEL M. · 2015 to 2018
$1.7M
ERROR CORRECTION IN DNA SYNTHESIS: A BIOCHEMICAL STUDYR01GM021422 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOODMAN, MYRON · 1985 to 2014
$1.6M
Intramural NIH HHSNIEHS NIH HHS ES012259NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012259NIGMS NIH HHS GM21422NIGMS NIH HHS GM32335NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM021422NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032335NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM021422NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM032335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial regulation is often encountered as a component of multi-tiered regulatory systems in eukaryotes, where processes are readily segregated by organelle boundaries. Well-characterized examples of spatial regulation are less common in bacteria. Low-fidelity DNA polymerase V (UmuD'2C) is produced in Escherichia coli as part of the bacterial SOS response to DNA damage. Due to the mutagenic potential of this enzyme, pol V activity is controlled by means of an elaborate regulatory system at transcriptional and posttranslational levels. Using single-molecule fluorescence microscopy to visualize UmuC inside living cells in space and time, we now show that pol V is also subject to a novel form of spatial regulation. After an initial delay (~ 45 min) post UV irradiation, UmuC is synthesized, but is not immediately activated. Instead, it is sequestered at the inner cell membrane. The release of UmuC into the cytosol requires the RecA* nucleoprotein filament-mediated cleavage of UmuD→UmuD'. Classic SOS damage response mutants either block [umuD(K97A)] or constitutively stimulate [recA(E38K)] UmuC release from the membrane. Foci of mutagenically active pol V Mut (UmuD'2C-RecA-ATP) formed in the cytosol after UV irradiation do not co-localize with pol III replisomes, suggesting a capacity to promote translesion DNA synthesis at lesions skipped over by DNA polymerase III. In effect, at least three molecular mechanisms limit the amount of time that pol V has to access DNA: (1) transcriptional and posttranslational regulation that initially keep the intracellular levels of pol V to a minimum; (2) spatial regulation via transient sequestration of UmuC at the membrane, which further delays pol V activation; and (3) the hydrolytic activity of a recently discovered pol V Mut ATPase function that limits active polymerase time on the chromosomal template.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialDNA DamageDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA ReplicationEnzyme ActivationEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalRec A RecombinasesSOS Response, GeneticsTranscription, GeneticUltraviolet RaysDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA polymerase V, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsRec A RecombinasesUmuC protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID26317348
PMCPMC4552617
OpenAlexW1652360688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.