Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26317216›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Exome Sequencing of Cell-Free DNA from Metastatic Cancer Patients Identifies Clinically Actionable Mutations Distinct from Primary Disease.

Timothy M Butler, Katherine Johnson-Camacho, Myron Peto, Nicholas J Wang, Tara A Macey, James E Korkola, Theresa M Koppie, Christopher L Corless, Joe W Gray, Paul T Spellman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Cancer-Like Fragmentomic Characteristics of Somatic Variants in Cell-Free DNA.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Liquid biopsy: state of reproductive medicine and beyond.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Review
  16. Clinical application of circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timothy M ButlerKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Katherine Johnson-CamachoKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Myron PetoKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Nicholas J WangKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Tara A MaceyKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
James E KorkolaKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Theresa M KoppieKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Christopher L CorlessKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Joe W GrayKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Paul T SpellmanKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of the molecular drivers of cancer by sequencing is the backbone of precision medicine and the basis of personalized therapy; however, biopsies of primary tumors provide only a snapshot of the evolution of the disease and may miss potential therapeutic targets, especially in the metastatic setting. A liquid biopsy, in the form of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing, has the potential to capture the inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity present in metastatic disease, and, through serial blood draws, track the evolution of the tumor genome. In order to determine the clinical utility of cfDNA sequencing we performed whole-exome sequencing on cfDNA and tumor DNA from two patients with metastatic disease; only minor modifications to our sequencing and analysis pipelines were required for sequencing and mutation calling of cfDNA. The first patient had metastatic sarcoma and 47 of 48 mutations present in the primary tumor were also found in the cell-free DNA. The second patient had metastatic breast cancer and sequencing identified an ESR1 mutation in the cfDNA and metastatic site, but not in the primary tumor. This likely explains tumor progression on Anastrozole. Significant heterogeneity between the primary and metastatic tumors, with cfDNA reflecting the metastases, suggested separation from the primary lesion early in tumor evolution. This is best illustrated by an activating PIK3CA mutation (H1047R) which was clonal in the primary tumor, but completely absent from either the metastasis or cfDNA. Here we show that cfDNA sequencing supplies clinically actionable information with minimal risks compared to metastatic biopsies. This study demonstrates the utility of whole-exome sequencing of cell-free DNA from patients with metastatic disease. cfDNA sequencing identified an ESR1 mutation, potentially explaining a patient's resistance to aromatase inhibition, and gave insight into how metastatic lesions differ from the primary tumor.

Indexed as

ExomeMutation, MissenseAmino Acid SubstitutionClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDNA, NeoplasmEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesSarcomaClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDNA, NeoplasmESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaNeoplasm ProteinsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26317216
PMCPMC4552879
OpenAlexW1940268157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.