Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26316945›Full record

ArticleLung cancer international2014

Simple and Objective Prediction of Survival in Patients with Lung Cancer: Staging the Host Systemic Inflammatory Response.

Derek Grose, Graham Devereux, Louise Brown, Richard Jones, Dave Sharma, Colin Selby, David S Morrison, Kirsty Docherty, David McIntosh, Penny McElhinney and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung cancer international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score at Recurrence Predicts Poor Survival in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Derek GroseBeatson Oncology Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2532-1818
Graham DevereuxUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Louise BrownBeatson Oncology Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK.
Richard JonesBeatson Oncology Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1392-2384
Dave SharmaInverclyde Royal Hospital, Inverclyde, UK.
Colin SelbyQueen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, UK.
David S MorrisonUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Kirsty DochertyInverclyde Royal Hospital, Inverclyde, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5250-3289
David McIntoshBeatson Oncology Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5725-8270
Penny McElhinneyGlasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Marianne NicolsonAberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.
Donald C McMillanUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Robert MilroyGlasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBInverclyde Royal Hospital · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBAberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBQueen Margaret Hospital · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Prediction of survival in patients diagnosed with lung cancer remains problematical. The aim of the present study was to examine the clinical utility of an established objective marker of the systemic inflammatory response, the Glasgow Prognostic Score, as the basis of risk stratification in patients with lung cancer. Methods. Between 2005 and 2008 all newly diagnosed lung cancer patients coming through the multidisciplinary meetings (MDTs) of four Scottish centres were included in the study. The details of 882 patients with a confirmed new diagnosis of any subtype or stage of lung cancer were collected prospectively. Results. The median survival was 5.6 months (IQR 4.8-6.5). Survival analysis was undertaken in three separate groups based on mGPS score. In the mGPS 0 group the most highly predictive factors were performance status, weight loss, stage of NSCLC, and palliative treatment offered. In the mGPS 1 group performance status, stage of NSCLC, and radical treatment offered were significant. In the mGPS 2 group only performance status and weight loss were statistically significant. Discussion. This present study confirms previous work supporting the use of mGPS in predicting cancer survival; however, it goes further by showing how it might be used to provide more objective risk stratification in patients diagnosed with lung cancer.

Identifiers

PMID26316945
PMCPMC4437395
OpenAlexW1972726653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.