ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2015
Triple negative breast cancer: an Indian perspective.
Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Its Clinical Features at Incidence in Indian Patients With Breast Cancer.JCO global oncology · 2020Pooled it
- An enhanced and efficient approach for feature selection for chronic human disease prediction: A breast cancer study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Breast cancer in young Indian women: factors, challenges in screening, and upcoming diagnostics.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Comprehensive characterization of immune landscape of Indian and Western triple negative breast cancers.Translational oncology · 2022Article
- Prevalence of Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer in India: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2021Review
- Are Basal-Like and Non-Basal-Like Triple-Negative Breast Cancers Really Different?Journal of oncology · 2020Article
- A Survey on Breast Cancer Awareness Among Medical, Paramedical, and General Population in North India Using Self-Designed Questionnaire: a Prospective Study.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2018Article
- Immunohistochemistry Heterogeneity in Reported Breast Cancer Demographics From India: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Rates Could Be Lower Than Suggested in Pooled Meta-Analysis.Journal of global oncology · 2017Article
- Clinicopathological Features of Triple Negative Breast Carcinoma.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017Article
- Prevalence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in India: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of global oncology · 2016Review
- Firefly-SVM predictive model for breast cancer subgroup classification with clinicopathological parameters.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBreast cancer is the most common female cancer in the world. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a recently identified biological variant with aggressive tumor behavior and poor prognosis. Data of hormonal status from the Indian population is scarce due to financial constraints in performing immunohistochemistry evaluation. The present study aims to prospectively analyze receptor status of all breast cancer patients and identify TNBC and compare their clinical profile and short term survival with other non-TNBC group. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll cytologically and histopathologically confirmed cases of carcinoma breast were prospectively enrolled. In a longitudinal study at tertiary care hospital in central India based on the hormonal status, they were further divided into TNBC and other groups. Comparison of risk factors, clinical profile and short-term survival was carried out.
resultsA total 85 patients were enrolled and of them 37 (43.7%) were TNBC. On comparing risk factors ie, age, age at menarche, total reproductive age, age at first child birth, and menopausal status - no statistical significance was observed between the TNBC and non-TNBC groups. But on comparison of clinical profile TNBC tumors were significantly large with majority of patients presenting as locally advanced breast cancer (83%). No statistical difference was observed in axillary lymph node status between two groups. TNBC tumors were histologically more aggressive (grade 3) compared to other groups. No statistically significant difference was observed in short term overall survival but all three deaths were observed in the TNBC group only and two local recurrences after surgery were observed in the TNBC group.
conclusionTNBC forms a large proportion of carcinoma breast patients in a central Indian scenario and needs more research to identify appropriate treatment planning considering aggressive histology and advanced presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.