Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26316775›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2015

Adaptive practices in heart failure care teams: implications for patient-centered care in the context of complexity.

Glendon R Tait, Joanna Bates, Kori A LaDonna, Valerie N Schulz, Patricia H Strachan, Allan McDougall, Lorelei Lingard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. 'Who is on your health-care team?' Asking individuals with heart failure about care team membership and roles.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Glendon R TaitDepartment of Psychiatry and Division of Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Joanna BatesCentre for Health Education Scholarship, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kori A LaDonnaCentre for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, University Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
Valerie N SchulzPalliative Care, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
Patricia H StrachanSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Allan McDougallCentre for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, University Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
Lorelei LingardCentre for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, University Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

CIHR 123234-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart failure (HF), one of the three leading causes of death, is a chronic, progressive, incurable disease. There is growing support for integration of palliative care's holistic approach to suffering, but insufficient understanding of how this would happen in the complex team context of HF care. This study examined how HF care teams, as defined by patients, work together to provide care to patients with advanced disease.

methodsTeam members were identified by each participating patient, generating team sampling units (TSUs) for each patient. Drawn from five study sites in three Canadian provinces, our dataset consists of 209 interviews from 50 TSUs. Drawing on a theoretical framing of HF teams as complex adaptive systems (CAS), interviews were analyzed using the constant comparative method associated with constructivist grounded theory.

resultsThis paper centers on the dominant theme of system practices, how HF care delivery is reported to work organizationally, socially, and practically, and describes two subthemes: "the way things work around here", which were commonplace, routine ways of doing things, and "the way we make things work around here", which were more conscious, effortful adaptations to usual practice in response to emergent needs. An adaptive practice, often a small alteration to routine, could have amplified effects beyond those intended by the innovating team member and could extend to other settings.

conclusionAdaptive practices emerged unpredictably and were variably experienced by team members. Our study offers an empirically grounded explanation of how HF care teams self-organize and how adaptive practices emerge from nonlinear interdependencies among diverse agents. We use these insights to reframe the question of palliative care integration, to ask how best to foster palliative care-aligned adaptive practices in HF care. This work has implications for health care's growing challenge of providing care to those with chronic medical illness in complex, team-based settings.

Indexed as

complex adaptive systemhealth care teamsmultimorbiditypalliative carequalitative

Identifiers

PMID26316775
PMCPMC4547636
OpenAlexW1187564817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.