ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2015
Adaptive practices in heart failure care teams: implications for patient-centered care in the context of complexity.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding heart failure; explaining telehealth - a hermeneutic systematic review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2017Pooled it
- Applying the principles of adaptive leadership to person-centred care for people with complex care needs: Considerations for care providers, patients, caregivers and organizations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Review
- General practitioners' perceptions about their role in current and future heart failure care: an exploratory qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Healthcare teams as complex adaptive systems: understanding team behaviour through team members' perception of interpersonal interaction.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Patients with heart failure and their partners with chronic illness: interdependence in multiple dimensions of time.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2018Article
- Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Beyond Simple Planning: Existential Dimensions of Conversations With Patients at Risk of Dying From Heart Failure.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2017Article
- 'Who is on your health-care team?' Asking individuals with heart failure about care team membership and roles.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017Article
- Improving care for heart failure patients in primary care, GPs' perceptions: a qualitative evidence synthesis.BMJ open · 2016Article
- Achieving Coordinated Care for Patients With Complex Cases of Cancer: A Multiteam System Approach.Journal of oncology practice · 2016Article
- Collaboration and entanglement: An actor-network theory analysis of team-based intraprofessional care for patients with advanced heart failure.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF), one of the three leading causes of death, is a chronic, progressive, incurable disease. There is growing support for integration of palliative care's holistic approach to suffering, but insufficient understanding of how this would happen in the complex team context of HF care. This study examined how HF care teams, as defined by patients, work together to provide care to patients with advanced disease.
methodsTeam members were identified by each participating patient, generating team sampling units (TSUs) for each patient. Drawn from five study sites in three Canadian provinces, our dataset consists of 209 interviews from 50 TSUs. Drawing on a theoretical framing of HF teams as complex adaptive systems (CAS), interviews were analyzed using the constant comparative method associated with constructivist grounded theory.
resultsThis paper centers on the dominant theme of system practices, how HF care delivery is reported to work organizationally, socially, and practically, and describes two subthemes: "the way things work around here", which were commonplace, routine ways of doing things, and "the way we make things work around here", which were more conscious, effortful adaptations to usual practice in response to emergent needs. An adaptive practice, often a small alteration to routine, could have amplified effects beyond those intended by the innovating team member and could extend to other settings.
conclusionAdaptive practices emerged unpredictably and were variably experienced by team members. Our study offers an empirically grounded explanation of how HF care teams self-organize and how adaptive practices emerge from nonlinear interdependencies among diverse agents. We use these insights to reframe the question of palliative care integration, to ask how best to foster palliative care-aligned adaptive practices in HF care. This work has implications for health care's growing challenge of providing care to those with chronic medical illness in complex, team-based settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.