Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26316730›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2015

Beneficial effects of multisensory and cognitive stimulation in institutionalized elderly: 12-months follow-up.

Liliane Dias E Dias de Macedo, Thaís Cristina Galdino De Oliveira, Fernanda Cabral Soares, João Bento-Torres, Natáli Valim Oliver Bento-Torres, Daniel Clive Anthony, Cristovam Wanderley Picanço-Diniz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Influence of schooling and age on cognitive performance in healthy older adults.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Liliane Dias E Dias de MacedoLaboratory of Investigations in Neurodegeneration and Infection, Institute of Biological Sciences, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Para, Brazil.
Thaís Cristina Galdino De OliveiraLaboratory of Investigations in Neurodegeneration and Infection, Institute of Biological Sciences, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Para, Brazil.
Fernanda Cabral SoaresLaboratory of Investigations in Neurodegeneration and Infection, Institute of Biological Sciences, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Para, Brazil.
João Bento-TorresLaboratory of Investigations in Neurodegeneration and Infection, Institute of Biological Sciences, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Para, Brazil ; College of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil.
Natáli Valim Oliver Bento-TorresLaboratory of Investigations in Neurodegeneration and Infection, Institute of Biological Sciences, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Para, Brazil ; College of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Para, Belem, Para, Brazil.
Daniel Clive AnthonyLaboratory of Experimental Neuropathology, Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.
Cristovam Wanderley Picanço-DinizLaboratory of Investigations in Neurodegeneration and Infection, Institute of Biological Sciences, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Federal University of Pará, Belem, Para, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Pará · BRUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously demonstrated the beneficial effects of a multisensory and cognitive stimulation program, consisting of 48 sessions, twice a week, to improve the cognition of elderly subjects living either in long-term care institutions (institutionalized - I) or in communities with their families (noninstitutionalized - NI). In the present study, we evaluated these subjects after the end of the intervention and compared the rate of age-related cognitive decline of those living in an enriched community environment (NI group, n=15, 74.1±3.9 years old) with those living in the impoverished environment of long-term care institutions (I group, n=20, 75.1±6.8 years old). Both groups participated fully in our stimulation program. Over 1 year, we conducted revaluations at five time points (2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, and 12 months) after the completion of the intervention. Both elderly groups were evaluated with the mini-mental state examination and selected language tests. Progressive cognitive decline was observed in both groups over the period. Indeed, it took only 4-6 months after the end of the stimulation program for significant reductions in language test scores to become apparent. However, earlier reductions in test scores were mainly associated with I group, and linguistic prosody test scores were significantly affected by institutionalization and time, two variables that interacted and reduced these scores. Moreover, I group reduced the Montréal cognitive assessment battery language tests scores 4 months before NI group. It remains to be investigated what mechanisms may explain the earlier and more intense language losses in institutionalized elderly.

Indexed as

CognitionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInstitutionalizationLanguageLife StyleLong-Term CareMaleNeuropsychological TestsSocioeconomic Factorsage-related cognitive impairmentcommunity livinglanguage assessmentlong-term care institutionsmultisensory and cognitive stimulation

Identifiers

PMID26316730
PMCPMC4547661
OpenAlexW1554161393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.