ArticleClinical interventions in aging2015
Beneficial effects of multisensory and cognitive stimulation in institutionalized elderly: 12-months follow-up.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computerised cognitive training for 12 or more weeks for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Computerised cognitive training for preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in midlife.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- The Hidden Dangers of Sedentary Living: Insights into Molecular, Cellular, and Systemic Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Effectiveness of Reminiscence Therapy versus Cognitive Stimulation Therapy in Older Adults with Cognitive Decline: A Quasi-Experimental Pilot Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2022Article
- Microglial Morphology Across Distantly Related Species: Phylogenetic, Environmental and Age Influences on Microglia Reactivity and Surveillance States.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Sensory and memory stimulation as a means to care for individuals with dementia in long-term care facilities.Clinical interventions in aging · 2018Review
- Environmental conditions differentially affect neurobehavioral outcomes in a mouse model of sepsis-associated encephalopathy.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Influence of schooling and age on cognitive performance in healthy older adults.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We previously demonstrated the beneficial effects of a multisensory and cognitive stimulation program, consisting of 48 sessions, twice a week, to improve the cognition of elderly subjects living either in long-term care institutions (institutionalized - I) or in communities with their families (noninstitutionalized - NI). In the present study, we evaluated these subjects after the end of the intervention and compared the rate of age-related cognitive decline of those living in an enriched community environment (NI group, n=15, 74.1±3.9 years old) with those living in the impoverished environment of long-term care institutions (I group, n=20, 75.1±6.8 years old). Both groups participated fully in our stimulation program. Over 1 year, we conducted revaluations at five time points (2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 8 months, and 12 months) after the completion of the intervention. Both elderly groups were evaluated with the mini-mental state examination and selected language tests. Progressive cognitive decline was observed in both groups over the period. Indeed, it took only 4-6 months after the end of the stimulation program for significant reductions in language test scores to become apparent. However, earlier reductions in test scores were mainly associated with I group, and linguistic prosody test scores were significantly affected by institutionalization and time, two variables that interacted and reduced these scores. Moreover, I group reduced the Montréal cognitive assessment battery language tests scores 4 months before NI group. It remains to be investigated what mechanisms may explain the earlier and more intense language losses in institutionalized elderly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.