Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26316595›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2015

Responses to Tobacco Smoking-Related Health Messages in Young People With Recent-Onset Schizophrenia.

Daniel J Coletti, Mary Brunette, Majnu John, John M Kane, Anil K Malhotra, Delbert G Robinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Brief Web-Based Interventions for Young Adult Smokers With Severe Mental Illnesses: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J Colettidcoletti@nshs.edu.
Mary BrunetteDepartment of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
Majnu JohnThe Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY; Division of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY;
John M KaneThe Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY; Division of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY; Departments of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY;
Anil K MalhotraThe Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY; Division of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY; Departments of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY;
Delbert G RobinsonThe Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY; Division of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY; Departments of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Hofstra-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY;
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research · USDartmouth College · USHofstra University · USZucker Hillside Hospital · US

Funding

Striatal D2/D3 Dopamine receptor availability in first episode schizophreniaP50MH080173 · NIMH · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI SMITH, GWENN S · 2008 to 2012
$10.4M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH080173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtually no research has examined the responses of youth with recent-onset psychosis (ROP) to smoking-related health warnings. We examined predictors of response and tested hypotheses that participants with ROP would (a) assess warnings as less effective than a healthy comparison (HC) group, and (b) assess video warnings as more effective than pictures. ROP participants (n = 69) had <2 years of prior antipsychotic treatment; the HC group (n = 79) had no major mental illness. Participants viewed 10 pictorial warnings, 8 videos depicting similar messages, and were interviewed regarding tobacco use, health literacy, and smoking knowledge. We assessed response at baseline and at 4-week follow-up. ROP participants were more likely than HC to smoke tobacco (49.3% vs 10.1%) and had lower levels of health literacy and smoking-related knowledge. Cannabis was used by 46.4% of ROP participants. Effectiveness ratings were high for both picture and video warnings with no differences between media. ROP participants compared to HC and nonsmokers compared to smokers were more likely to perceive warnings as effective. Effectiveness was associated with negative affect and greater emotional arousal. We assessed 33 smokers at follow-up; 5 (15%) identified as nonsmokers, 15 (45%) made a quit attempt, and 16 (49%) reported that the warnings influenced their smoking. Results indicate that young people with psychotic disorders respond favorably to health warnings. Effective messages depict health consequences clearly, elicit negative emotions, and may impact smoking behavior. Future research is needed to understand the effects of mode of presentation and message comprehension on smoking behavior.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSchizophreniaSmoking PreventionAdolescentAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth LiteracyHealth PromotionHumansMaleMarijuana SmokingSmokingTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultcigarette smokinghealth literacyhealth warning labelsmental illnessschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID26316595
PMCPMC4601721
OpenAlexW2235969324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.