Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26316458›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Data integration of structured and unstructured sources for assigning clinical codes to patient stays.

Elyne Scheurwegs, Kim Luyckx, Léon Luyten, Walter Daelemans, Tim Van den Bulcke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Graph representation and learning for drug administration prediction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The prediction of hospital length of stay using unstructured data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elyne ScheurwegsADReM (Advanced Database Research and Modelling), Biomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp (biomina), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium elyne.scheurwegs@uantwerpen.be.
Kim LuyckxDepartment of Medical Information, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Léon LuytenDepartment of Medical Information, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Walter DaelemansComputational Linguistics and Psycholinguistics (CLiPS) Research Center, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Tim Van den BulckeBiomedical Informatics Research Center Antwerp (biomina), University of Antwerp - Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium; ADReM (Advanced Database Research and Modelling), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEnormous amounts of healthcare data are becoming increasingly accessible through the large-scale adoption of electronic health records. In this work, structured and unstructured (textual) data are combined to assign clinical diagnostic and procedural codes (specifically ICD-9-CM) to patient stays. We investigate whether integrating these heterogeneous data types improves prediction strength compared to using the data types in isolation.

methodsTwo separate data integration approaches were evaluated. Early data integration combines features of several sources within a single model, and late data integration learns a separate model per data source and combines these predictions with a meta-learner. This is evaluated on data sources and clinical codes from a broad set of medical specialties.

resultsWhen compared with the best individual prediction source, late data integration leads to improvements in predictive power (eg, overall F-measure increased from 30.6% to 38.3% for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic codes), while early data integration is less consistent. The predictive strength strongly differs between medical specialties, both for ICD-9-CM diagnostic and procedural codes. DISCUSSION: Structured data provides complementary information to unstructured data (and vice versa) for predicting ICD-9-CM codes. This can be captured most effectively by the proposed late data integration approach.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that models using multiple electronic health record data sources systematically outperform models using data sources in isolation in the task of predicting ICD-9-CM codes over a broad range of medical specialties.

Indexed as

International Classification of DiseasesClinical CodingData MiningDatasets as TopicElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine Learningclinical codingdata integrationdata miningelectronic health recordsinternational classification of diseases

Identifiers

PMID26316458
PMCPMC4954635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.