Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26315934›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2015

A systematic review of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and mathematical ability: current findings and future implications.

Maria Grazia Tosto, Sukhleen Kaur Momi, Philip Asherson, Karim Malki

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Grazia TostoKing's College London, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre (SGDP), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), (PO80), De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. maria.tosto@kcl.ac.uk.
Sukhleen Kaur MomiKing's College London, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre (SGDP), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), (PO80), De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. sukhleen.momi@kcl.ac.uk.
Philip AshersonKing's College London, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre (SGDP), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), (PO80), De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. philip.asherson@kcl.ac.uk.
Karim MalkiKing's College London, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre (SGDP), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), (PO80), De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. karim.malki@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G9817803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral recent behavioural and behavioural genetic studies have investigated the relationship between attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and mathematical ability. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of these studies to date. An emphasis was placed on reviewing results that explored the association between mathematics and the two ADHD components of attention and hyperactivity-impulsivity separately.

methodsA systematic search of quantitative studies investigating the association between mathematics and ADHD was conducted across five databases (PsychINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus). A total of 30 cross-sectional and four longitudinal studies were included in this review.

resultsNarrative synthesis of the results was provided using PRISMA guidelines. Taken together, the studies pointed at substantial evidence for a negative association between ADHD symptoms and mathematical ability. This association was particularly marked for the inattentive component of ADHD than for the hyperactive-impulsive component. Evidence from twin studies also showed a significant genetic correlation between mathematics and ADHD, which was greater for the inattentive component of ADHD compared to the hyperactive-impulsive component.

conclusionsThe differential relationship of the hyperactivity-impulsivity and inattention domains with mathematics emphasises the heterogeneity within the disorder and suggests a partially different aetiology of the two ADHD domains. A better understanding of the aetiology of ADHD could help develop more efficient interventions aimed at the reduction of its symptoms. It could also offer an explanatory framework for shortcomings in achievement and inform the development of non-pharmacological intervention strategies.

Indexed as

CognitionComprehensionAdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildEducational MeasurementHumansImpulsive BehaviorLongitudinal StudiesMathematical Concepts

Identifiers

PMID26315934
PMCPMC4552374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.