Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26315814›Full record

ReviewHealth psychology review2016

How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults.

Benjamin Gardner, Lee Smith, Fabiana Lorencatto, Mark Hamer, Stuart J H Biddle

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health psychology review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 233 papers, 47 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
233citing papers in PubMed, 47 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02785640 nacompletednot on this map

A Study to Assess the Impact of a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Prolonged Sitting in the Workplace

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlasgow Caledonian UniversityRan2016 to 2016Enrolled30ConditionsSedentary LifestyleArmsHourly prompts to stand delivered by Microsoft Outlook
NCT03137836 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Sit-to-stand Desks on Behavior and Cognitive Function in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LisbonRan2016 to 2016Enrolled49ConditionsSedentary Lifestyle, Cognitive Ability, GeneralArmsIntervention
NCT05571124 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Implementation of a Web-based Workplace Exercise Intervention in the Reduction of Spinal Pain in Sedentary Administrative Personnel: Protocol of a Mixed Methodology Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat de LleidaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled66ConditionsBack Pain, Sedentary BehaviorArmsTherapeutic Exercise Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

233 citing papers in PubMed, 47 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Exercise-based interventions targeting balance and falls in people with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

173 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin Gardnera Department of Psychology , Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London , London , UK.
Lee Smithc Health Behaviour Research Centre , University College London , London , UK.
Fabiana Lorencattod Health Services Research & Management Division , School of Health Sciences, City University London , London , UK.
Mark Hamere National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine , Loughborough University , Loughborough , UK.
Stuart J H Biddlef Institute of Sport, Exercise & Active Living, Victoria University , Melbourne , Australia.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UK 14133Chief Scientist OfficeMedical Research Council MR/J000396/1Medical Research Council MR/J000396/2Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedentary behaviour - i.e., low energy-expending waking behaviour while seated or lying down - is a health risk factor, even when controlling for physical activity. This review sought to describe the behaviour change strategies used within interventions that have sought to reduce sedentary behaviour in adults. Studies were identified through existing literature reviews, a systematic database search, and hand-searches of eligible papers. Interventions were categorised as 'very promising', 'quite promising', or 'non-promising' according to observed behaviour changes. Intervention functions and behaviour change techniques were compared across promising and non-promising interventions. Twenty-six eligible studies reported thirty-eight interventions, of which twenty (53%) were worksite-based. Fifteen interventions (39%) were very promising, eight quite promising (21%), and fifteen non-promising (39%). Very or quite promising interventions tended to have targeted sedentary behaviour instead of physical activity. Interventions based on environmental restructuring, persuasion, or education were most promising. Self-monitoring, problem solving, and restructuring the social or physical environment were particularly promising behaviour change techniques. Future sedentary reduction interventions might most fruitfully incorporate environmental modification and self-regulatory skills training. The evidence base is, however, weakened by low-quality evaluation methods; more RCTs, employing no-treatment control groups, and collecting objective data are needed.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionSedentary BehaviorAdultFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsWorkplaceYoung Adultbehaviour changeinterventionsedentary behaviour

Identifiers

PMID26315814
PMCPMC4743603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.