Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26315712›Full record

Observational studyMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2015

Attitudes of physicians toward assessing risk and using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy associated with an intermediate risk of febrile neutropenia.

Gilles Freyer, Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha, Konstantinos Syrigos, Mihai Marinca, Giuseppe Tonini, Say Liang Ng, Zee Wan Wong, Antonio Salar, Guenther Steger, Mahmoud Abdelsalam and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01813721 (Study to Investigate Which Clinical Risk Factors Are Considered by Physicians When Conducting Overall Febrile Neutropenia Risk Assessments for Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With an Intermediate), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01813721 completednot on this map

Study to Investigate Which Clinical Risk Factors Are Considered by Physicians When Conducting Overall Febrile Neutropenia Risk Assessments for Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With an Intermediate (10% - 20%) Febrile Neutropenia Risk.

TypeobservationalSponsorAmgenRan2012 to 2013Enrolled1,007ConditionsChemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. G-CSF guideline adherence in Germany, an update with a retrospective and representative sample survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  3. Real-world use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ambulatory breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 10 countries.

Gilles FreyerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon Cancer Institute, Lyon University, Lyon, France, gilles.freyer@univ-lyon1.fr.
Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha
Konstantinos Syrigos
Mihai Marinca
Giuseppe Tonini
Say Liang Ng
Zee Wan Wong
Antonio Salar
Guenther Steger
Mahmoud Abdelsalam
Lucy DeCosta
Zsolt Szabo
Amgen (Switzerland) · CHAmgen (United Kingdom) · GBBendigo Health · AUGoulburn Valley Health · AUGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROHospices Civils de Lyon · FRHospital Del Mar · ESMedical University of Vienna · ATMoncton Hospital · CASotiria General Hospital · GRUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a potentially fatal complication of chemotherapy. This prospective, observational study describes physicians' approaches toward assessing FN risk in patients receiving chemotherapy regimens with an intermediate (10-20 %) FN risk. In the baseline investigator assessment, physicians selected factors considered important when assessing overall FN risk and deciding on granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) primary prophylaxis (PP). Physicians then completed patient assessments using the same lists of factors. The final FN risk scores and whether G-CSF PP was planned were reported. The final analysis included 165 physicians and 944 patients. The most frequently considered factor in both assessments was chemotherapy agents in the backbone (88 % of investigator and 93 % of patient assessments). History of FN (83 %), baseline laboratory values (76 %) and age (73 %) were commonly selected at baseline, whereas tumor type (72 %), guidelines (62 %) and tumor stage (43 %) were selected most during patient assessments. Median investigator-reported FN risk threshold for G-CSF PP was 20 % (range 10-85 %). G-CSF PP was planned in 82 % of patients with an FN risk at or above this threshold; therefore, almost one-fifth of qualifying patients would not receive G-CSF PP. Physicians generally follow guidelines, but also consider individual patient characteristics when assessing FN risk and deciding on G-CSF PP. A standardized FN risk assessment may optimize the use of G-CSF PP, which may minimize the incidence of FN in patients undergoing chemotherapy with an intermediate FN risk. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01813721.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsFebrile NeutropeniaFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhysiciansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID26315712
OpenAlexW2266378286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.