ArticleChinese medical journal2015
Protective Effects of Estradiol on Myocardial Contractile Function Following Hemorrhagic Shock and Resuscitation in Rats.
Article in Chinese medical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Irisin attenuates cardiac injury and improves prognosis in rats with hemorrhagic shock by maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis via the AMPK/Drp1 pathway.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Sex disparities in adverse outcomes after surgically managed isolated traumatic spinal injury.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- Gender differences in trauma, shock and sepsis.Military Medical Research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHemorrhagic shock (HS) results in myocardial contractile dysfunction. Studies showed that 17β-estradiol protects the myocardium against contractile dysfunction. The study investigated the cardioprotective effects of treatment with 17β-estradiol before resuscitation following 1 h of HS and resuscitation.
methodsMale Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to 2 sets of experimental protocols: Ex vivo and in vivo treatment and resuscitation. Each set had three experimental groups (n = 6 per group): Normotensive (N), HS and resuscitation (HS-R) and HS rats treated with 17β-estradiol (E) and resuscitated (HS-E-R). Rats were hemorrhaged over 60-min to reach a mean arterial blood pressure of 40 mmHg. In the ex vivo group, hearts were resuscitated by perfusion in the Langendorff system. In the 17β-estradiol treated group, 17β-estradiol 280 µg/kg was added for thefirst 5 min. Cardiac function was measured. Left ventricular generated pressure (LVGP) and +dP/dt were calculated. In the in vivo group, rats were treated with 17β-estradiol 280 µg/kg s.c. after 60-min HS. Resuscitation was performed in vivo by the reinfusion of the shed blood for 30-min to restore normotension.
resultsTreatment with 17β-estradiol before resuscitation in ex vivo treated and resuscitated isolated hearts and in the in vivo treated and resuscitated rats following HS improved myocardial contractile function. In the in vivo treated group, LVGP and +dP/dt max were significantly higher in 17β-estradiol treated rats compared to the untreated group (LVGP 136.40 ± 6.61 compared to 47.58 ± 17.55, and +dP/dt 661.85 ± 49.88 compared to 88.18 ± 0.85). Treatment with 17β-estradiol improved LVGP following HS.
conclusionsThe results indicate that treatment with 17β-estradiol before resuscitation following HS protects the myocardium against dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.