Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26314988›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2015

Whole-exome analysis reveals novel somatic genomic alterations associated with outcome in immunochemotherapy-treated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

A J Novak, Y W Asmann, M J Maurer, C Wang, S L Slager, L S Hodge, M Manske, T Price-Troska, Z-Z Yang, M T Zimmermann and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Recent advances in CD5Annals of hematology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Carnitine Traffic in Cells. Link With Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

A J NovakDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Y W AsmannDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
M J MaurerDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
C WangDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S L SlagerDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
L S HodgeDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M ManskeDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
T Price-TroskaDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Z-Z YangDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M T ZimmermannDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
G S NowakowskiDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S M AnsellDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
T E WitzigDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
E McPhailDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
R KetterlingDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
A L FeldmanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
A DoganDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hematopathology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
B K LinkInternal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
T M HabermannDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J R CerhanDivision of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

The Role of Monocytes in non-Hodgkin LymphomaP50CA097274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WEINER, GEORGE J. · 2002 to 2021
$45.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lack of remission or early relapse remains a major clinical issue in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with 30% of patients failing standard of care. Although clinical factors and molecular signatures can partially predict DLBCL outcome, additional information is needed to identify high-risk patients, particularly biologic factors that might ultimately be amenable to intervention. Using whole-exome sequencing data from 51 newly diagnosed and immunochemotherapy-treated DLBCL patients, we evaluated the association of somatic genomic alterations with patient outcome, defined as failure to achieve event-free survival at 24 months after diagnosis (EFS24). We identified 16 genes with mutations, 374 with copy number gains and 151 with copy number losses that were associated with failure to achieve EFS24 (P<0.05). Except for FOXO1 and CIITA, known driver mutations did not correlate with EFS24. Gene losses were localized to 6q21-6q24.2, and gains to 3q13.12-3q29, 11q23.1-11q23.3 and 19q13.12-19q13.43. Globally, the number of gains was highly associated with poor outcome (P=7.4 × 10(-12)) and when combined with FOXO1 mutations identified 77% of cases that failed to achieve EFS24. One gene (SLC22A16) at 6q21, a doxorubicin transporter, was lost in 54% of EFS24 failures and our findings suggest it functions as a doxorubicin transporter in DLBCL cells.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiological TransportCombined Modality TherapyDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA Mutational AnalysisDoxorubicinExomeFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenome, HumanHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMaleMiddle AgedDoxorubicinOrganic Cation Transport ProteinsSLC22A16 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26314988
PMCPMC4558593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.