Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26314843›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

TERT promoter mutations contribute to IDH mutations in predicting differential responses to adjuvant therapies in WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas.

Zhen-Yu Zhang, Aden Ka-Yin Chan, Xiao-Jie Ding, Zhi-Yong Qin, Christopher S Hong, Ling-Chao Chen, Xin Zhang, Fang-Ping Zhao, Yin Wang, Yang Wang and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Association of human telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation with unfavorable prognosis in glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Detection ofBiomedicines · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Qualitative Signature to IdentifyFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic Targets in Telomerase and Telomere Biology of Cancers.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2020
    Review
  12. TheCells · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Future Strategies on Glioma Research: From Big Data to the Clinic.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhen-Yu ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Aden Ka-Yin ChanDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Xiao-Jie DingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhi-Yong QinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Christopher S HongSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Ling-Chao ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fang-Ping ZhaoGenetron Health, Inc., Chaoyang District, Beijing, China.
Yin WangDepartment of Neuropathology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yang WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Liang-Fu ZhouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhengping ZhuangSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Ho-Keung NgDepartment of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Hai YanDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, The Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Yu YaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ying MaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Huashan Hospital · CNFudan University · CNNational Institutes of Health · USChinese University of Hong Kong · CNDuke Medical Center · USPrince of Wales Hospital · CN

Funding

Molecular Pathogenesis of NeoplasiaZIANS003052 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI HEISS, JOHN · 2009 to 2025
$20.7M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IDH mutations frequently occur in WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas and have favorable prognosis compared to wild-type tumors. However, whether IDH mutations in WHO grade II and II diffuse gliomas predict enhanced sensitivity to adjuvant radiation (RT) or chemotherapy (CHT) is still being debated. Recent studies have identified recurrent mutations in the promoter region of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) in gliomas. We previously demonstrated that TERT promoter mutations may be promising biomarkers in glioma survival prognostication when combined with IDH mutations. This study analyzed IDH and TERT promoter mutations in 295 WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas treated with or without adjuvant therapies to explore their impact on the sensitivity of tumors to genotoxic therapies. IDH mutations were found in 216 (73.2%) patients and TERT promoter mutations were found in 112 (38%) patients. In multivariate analysis, IDH mutations (p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS in patients receiving genotoxic therapies while TERT promoter mutations were not. In univariate analysis, IDH and TERT promoter mutations were not significant prognostic factors in patients who did not receive genotoxic therapies. Adjuvant RT and CHT were factors independently impacting PFS (RT p = 0.001, CHT p = 0.026) in IDH mutated WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas but not in IDH wild-type group. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated TERT promoter mutations further stratified IDH wild-type WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas into two subgroups with different responses to genotoxic therapies. Adjuvant RT and CHT were significant parameters influencing PFS in the IDH wt/TERT mut subgroup (RT p = 0.015, CHT p = 0.015) but not in the IDH wt/TERT wt subgroup. Our data demonstrated that IDH mutated WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas had better PFS and OS than their IDH wild-type counterparts when genotoxic therapies were administered after surgery. Importantly, we also found that TERT promoter mutations further stratify IDH wild-type WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas into two subgroups with different responses to adjuvant therapies. Taken together, TERT promoter mutations may predict enhanced sensitivity to genotoxic therapies in IDH wild-type WHO grade II and III diffuse gliomas and may justify intensified treatment in this subgroup.

Indexed as

MutationAdultBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesFemaleGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm GradingPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseTelomeraseTERT protein, humanchemotherapygliomasIDHradiation therapyTERT promoter

Identifiers

PMID26314843
PMCPMC4694799
OpenAlexW2133349879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.