Observational studyOncotarget2015
Host genotype and tumor phenotype of chemokine decoy receptors integrally affect breast cancer relapse.
Observational study in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of chemokine and chemokine receptor gene variants with occurrence of multiple primary melanoma.Melanoma research · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Prognostic Microenvironment-Related Genes in Invasive Breast Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- The multifarious roles of the chemokine CXCL14 in cancer progression and immune responses.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2020Review
- A Window of Opportunity: Targeting Cancer Endothelium to Enhance Immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Beyond Cell Motility: The Expanding Roles of Chemokines and Their Receptors in Malignancy.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Complicated prognostic values of CCL28 in breast cancer by subtype.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- The Interplay Between Lymphatic Vessels and Chemokines.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Effect of functional genetic variants in chemokine decoy receptors on the recurrence risk of breast cancer.Cancer medicine · 2018Article
- Impact of genetic polymorphisms determining leukocyte/neutrophil count on chemotherapy toxicity.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2018Article
- Up-regulation of chemokine receptor CCR4 is associated with Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma malignant behavior.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Intratumoral expression of CCR3 in breast cancer is associated with improved relapse-free survival in luminal-like disease.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- ACKR2: An Atypical Chemokine Receptor Regulating Lymphatic Biology.Frontiers in immunology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChemokines may play vital roles in breast cancer progression and metastasis. The primary members of chemokine decoy receptors (CDR), DARC and D6, are expressed in breast tumors and lymphatic/hematogenous vessels. CDRs sequestrate the pro-malignant chemokines. We hypothesized that breast cancer patients carrying different levels of CDR expression in tumor and/or in host might have differing clinical outcomes.
methodsThis prospective observational study measured both expression and germline genotype of DARC and D6 in 463 primary breast cancer patients enrolled between 2004 and 2006. The endpoint was breast cancer relapse-free survival (RFS).
resultsThere was a significant association between the co-expression of CDR (immunohistochemical expression of both DARC and D6) with RFS (hazard ratio [HR] of 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19 to 0.54). Furthermore, the co-genotype of two non-synonymous polymorphisms (with two major alleles of DARC-rs12075 and D6-rs2228468 versus the others) significantly related to relapse. Mechanistically, the variant-alleles of these two polymorphisms significantly decreased by 20-30% of CCL2/CCL5 (CDR ligands) levels relative to their major counterparts. Multivariate analysis highlighted that the co-expression and co-genotype of CDR were independent predictors of RFS, with HR of 0.46 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.80) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.85), respectively. The addition of host CDR genetic information to tumor-based factors (including co-expression of CDR) improved the relapse prediction ability (P = 0.02 of AUC comparison).
conclusionThe host genotype and tumor phenotype of CDR integrally affect breast cancer relapse. Host-related factors should be considered for individualized prediction of prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.