Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26314754›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2015

Assessing the effects of physical and perceived luminance contrast on RT and TMS-induced percepts.

Ramisha Knight, Chiara Mazzi, Silvia Savazzi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ramisha KnightUniversity of Verona and National Institute of Neuroscience, Verona, Italy.
Chiara MazziUniversity of Verona and National Institute of Neuroscience, Verona, Italy.
Silvia SavazziUniversity of Verona and National Institute of Neuroscience, Verona, Italy. silvia.savazzi@univr.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simple reaction times (RTs) are inversely related to the luminance of a visual region, with RT increasing as luminance decreases, and decreasing as luminance increases. A potential discrepancy in the link between luminance and RT, however, stems from the perception of luminance itself. Here, we tested whether RT is modulated by a measureable amount of light (luminance) or perceptual amount of light (brightness), as two test regions having the same luminance can be perceived as having different brightness. The current study investigates the effects of brightness using probes and artificial percepts, i.e., transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced light and dark percepts. In Experiment 1, participants performed a RT task to light and dark probes presented over two backgrounds, one exhibiting a physical luminance and the other exhibiting perceptual brightness. Experiment 2 tested whether perceptual brightness could influence RT and frequency of artificial percepts. We found that while brightness contrast modulated RT to the dark probes, the frequency of artificial percepts was susceptible to both physical and perceived changes in luminance. These data suggest that some behavioral responses can be influenced by an illusion of brightness, wherein there is no actual change in luminance, as well as the perception of TMS-induced percepts.

Indexed as

LightAdultContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansMaleOccipital LobePsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung AdultBrightnessLuminancePsychological phenomenaVisual perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.