ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015
Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Providers' perspective on vaginal birth after cesarean birth: a qualitative systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018Pooled it
- Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.PLoS medicine · 2018Pooled it
- OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Acceptance of trial of labour after caesarean with checklist used in counselling during antenatal care at a teaching institution in Bihar, India: A prospective observational study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Success rate and obstetric outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean delivery-Decision-tree analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
- Preference and determinants of delivery mode in pregnant women with one cesarean scar: a cross-sectional study in two urban Ugandan public hospitals.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Examining provider practice-level disparities in delivery outcomes among patients with a history of Cesarean Delivery.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Cesarean section rates in Turkey 2018-2023: Overview of national data by using Robson ten group classification system.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Article
- Behavioural factors associated with fear of litigation as a driver for the increased use of caesarean sections: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Once a cesarean, always a cesarean? Obstetricians' approach to counseling for trial of labor after cesarean.AJOG global reports · 2022Article
- Vaginal birth after Cesarean experience in Romania: A retrospective case-series study and online survey.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
- Acceptance of Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section Trial in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2021Article
- Women's experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Factors obstetricians, family physicians and midwives consider when counselling women about a trial of labour after caesarean and planned repeat caesarean: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- To challenge oneself as a childbearing woman-the lived experience of vaginal birth after caesarean section in Sweden.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2019Article
- Interventions targeted at health professionals to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a qualitative evidence synthesis.BMJ open · 2018Review
- Is Vaginal Birth without an Episiotomy a Rarity in the 21st Century? Cross-Sectional Studies in Southern Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Examination of the association of physical activity during pregnancy after cesarean delivery and vaginal birth among Chinese women.Reproductive health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe most common reason for caesarean section (CS) is repeat CS following previous CS. Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) rates vary widely in different healthcare settings and countries. Obtaining deeper knowledge of clinicians' views on VBAC can help in understanding the factors of importance for increasing VBAC rates. Interview studies with clinicians and women in three countries with high VBAC rates (Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands) and three countries with low VBAC rates (Ireland, Italy and Germany) are part of 'OptiBIRTH', an ongoing research project. The study reported here is based on interviews in high VBAC countries. The aim of the study was to investigate the views of clinicians working in countries with high VBAC rates on factors of importance for improving VBAC rates.
methodsIndividual (face-to-face or telephone) interviews and focus group interviews with clinicians (in different maternity care settings) in three countries with high VBAC rates were conducted during 2012-2013. In total, 44 clinicians participated: 26 midwives and 18 obstetricians. Five central questions about VBAC were used and interviews were analysed using content analysis. The analysis was performed in each country in the native language and then translated into English. All data were then analysed together and final categories were validated in each country.
resultsThe findings are presented in four main categories with subcategories. First, a common approach is needed, including: feeling confident with VBAC, considering VBAC as the first alternative, communicating well, working in a team, working in accordance with a model and making agreements with the woman. Second, obstetricians need to make the final decision on the mode of delivery while involving women in counselling towards VBAC. Third, a woman who has a previous CS has a similar need for support as other labouring women, but with some extra precautions and additional recommendations for her care. Finally, clinicians should help strengthen women's trust in VBAC, including building their trust in giving birth vaginally, recognising that giving birth naturally is an empowering experience for women, alleviating fear and offering extra visits to discuss the previous CS, and joining with the woman in a dialogue while leaving the decision about the mode of birth open.
conclusionsThis study shows that, according to midwives and obstetricians from countries with high VBAC rates, the important factors for improving the VBAC rate are related to the structure of the maternity care system in the country, to the cooperation between midwives and obstetricians, and to the care offered during pregnancy and birth. More research on clinicians' perspectives is needed from countries with low, as well as high, VBAC rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.