Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26313786›Full record

ArticleMedicine2015

Current Status of Breast Reconstruction in Southern China: A 15 Year, Single Institutional Experience of 20,551 Breast Cancer Patients.

Chen Jia-Jian, Huang Nai-Si, Xue Jing-Yan, Yang Ben-Long, Liu Guang-Yu, Di Gen-Hong, Shao Zhi-Min, Wu Jiong

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07237828 (Drainage Removal After Reverse-Sequence Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction on Postoperative Safety and Patient Satisfaction), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07237828 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Drainage Removal After Reverse-Sequence Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction on Postoperative Safety and Patient Satisfaction : A National Multicenter, Open, Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDu ZhengguiRan2025 to 2032Enrolled379ConditionsBreast CancerArmsDrain Removal Timing After Endoscopic Breast Reconstruction Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Choice of immediate breast reconstructive methods after modified radical mastectomy].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chen Jia-JianFrom the Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (CJJ, HNS, XJY, YBL, LGY, DGH, SZM, WJ).
Huang Nai-Si
Xue Jing-Yan
Yang Ben-Long
Liu Guang-Yu
Di Gen-Hong
Shao Zhi-Min
Wu Jiong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of this study is to assess the current status and trend of the application of breast reconstruction in China.A retrospective review of all patients who had received surgical treatment for breast cancer in the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between January 1999 and June 2014 was performed. The clinicopathological and epidemiological parameters and the follow-up information of each patient were collected.A total of 20,551 patients with 20,974 surgeries were identified. Of those, the rates of patients received mastectomy, breast conserving therapy, and breast reconstruction were 81.2% (17,040 cases), 15.3% (3216 cases), and 3.4% (718 cases), respectively. Skin-sparing mastectomy with autologous breast reconstruction was algate the dominant option for breast reconstruction although a rapid growth in the application of prosthetic reconstructions was observed in recent years. The rates of complications that required reoperation in patients reconstructed with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap, pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, free flaps, and prosthesis were 1.2%, 8.5%, 11.4%, and 10.5%, respectively, while the revision rates were 0.7%, 6.1 %, 5.3%, and 2.3%, respectively. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that types of surgery did not affect the disease-free survival of breast cancer patients.Skin-sparing mastectomy with breast reconstruction is oncologically safe while achieving satisfactory aesthetic outcomes. Autologous reconstruction remains the most commonly used technique while there is a rapid increase of prosthetic reconstruction in recent years. The low demand for breast aesthetics among Chinese women, defects of healthcare system, and the limited availability of recourses impeded the development of breast reconstruction techniques in China.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMastectomyAdultChinaFemaleHumansMammaplastyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingOutcome Assessment, Health CareReoperationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26313786
PMCPMC4602900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.