Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26313749›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

CoGA: An R Package to Identify Differentially Co-Expressed Gene Sets by Analyzing the Graph Spectra.

Suzana de Siqueira Santos, Thais Fernanda de Almeida Galatro, Rodrigo Akira Watanabe, Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo, Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie, André Fujita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Expression of the Circadian Clock GeneFrontiers in oncology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suzana de Siqueira SantosDepartment of Computer Science, Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thais Fernanda de Almeida GalatroDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo Akira WatanabeDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sueli Mieko Oba-ShinjoDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Suely Kazue Nagahashi MarieDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
André FujitaDepartment of Computer Science, Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene set analysis aims to identify predefined sets of functionally related genes that are differentially expressed between two conditions. Although gene set analysis has been very successful, by incorporating biological knowledge about the gene sets and enhancing statistical power over gene-by-gene analyses, it does not take into account the correlation (association) structure among the genes. In this work, we present CoGA (Co-expression Graph Analyzer), an R package for the identification of groups of differentially associated genes between two phenotypes. The analysis is based on concepts of Information Theory applied to the spectral distributions of the gene co-expression graphs, such as the spectral entropy to measure the randomness of a graph structure and the Jensen-Shannon divergence to discriminate classes of graphs. The package also includes common measures to compare gene co-expression networks in terms of their structural properties, such as centrality, degree distribution, shortest path length, and clustering coefficient. Besides the structural analyses, CoGA also includes graphical interfaces for visual inspection of the networks, ranking of genes according to their "importance" in the network, and the standard differential expression analysis. We show by both simulation experiments and analyses of real data that the statistical tests performed by CoGA indeed control the rate of false positives and is able to identify differentially co-expressed genes that other methods failed.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer GraphicsGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationHumansModels, BiologicalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID26313749
PMCPMC4551485
OpenAlexW1923068721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.