ReviewEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
Fluid therapy for septic shock resuscitation: which fluid should be used?
Review in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Identification of differentially expressed genes associated with tracheal injury recovery in a rabbit model of septic shock.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Partial depletion of circulating neutrophil granulocytes in mice exacerbates the inflammatory response and hypothermia during LPS induced severe systemic inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Hypervolemia suppresses dilutional anaemic injury in a rat model of haemodilution.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- A retrospective analysis of normal saline and lactated ringers as resuscitation fluid in sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- The effect of HES130/0.4 sodium chloride solution on kidney function following early fluid resuscitation in shock patients.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Article
- The influence of fasting and carbohydrate-enriched drink administration on body water amount and distribution: a volunteer randomized study.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2021Article
- EPA is Cardioprotective in Male Rats Subjected to Sepsis, but ALA Is Not Beneficial.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The Use of Fluids in Sepsis.Cureus · 2016Review
- Palestinian strategies, guidelines, and challenges in the treatment and management of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).Avicenna journal of medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early resuscitation of septic shock patients reduces the sepsis-related morbidity and mortality. The main goals of septic shock resuscitation include volemic expansion, maintenance of adequate tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery, guided by central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, mixed or central venous oxygen saturation and arterial lactate levels. An aggressive fluid resuscitation, possibly in association with vasopressors, inotropes and red blood cell concentrate transfusion may be necessary to achieve those hemodynamic goals. Nonetheless, even though fluid administration is one of the most common interventions offered to critically ill patients, the most appropriate type of fluid to be used remains controversial. According to recently published clinical trials, crystalloid solutions seem to be the most appropriate type of fluids for initial resuscitation of septic shock patients. Balanced crystalloids have theoretical advantages over the classic solutions, but there is not enough evidence to indicate it as first-line treatment. Additionally, when large amounts of fluids are necessary to restore the hemodynamic stability, albumin solutions may be a safe and effective alternative. Hydroxyethyl starches solutions must be avoided in septic patients due to the increased risk of acute renal failure, increased need for renal replacement therapy and increased mortality. Our objective was to present a narrative review of the literature regarding the major types of fluids and their main drawbacks in the initial resuscitation of the septic shock patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.