Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26313361›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Impact of Genomics Platform and Statistical Filtering on Transcriptional Benchmark Doses (BMD) and Multiple Approaches for Selection of Chemical Point of Departure (PoD).

A Francina Webster, Nikolai Chepelev, Rémi Gagné, Byron Kuo, Leslie Recio, Andrew Williams, Carole L Yauk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analytical choices drive toxicogenomic potency estimates: a systematic evaluation of transcriptomic points of departure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Investigating the dependency of in vitro benchmark concentrations on exposure time in transcriptomics experiments.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From vision toward best practices: EvaluatingFrontiers in toxicology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ALOHA: Aggregated local extrema splines for high-throughput dose-response analysis.Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A Francina WebsterEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Canada.
Nikolai ChepelevEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Rémi GagnéEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Byron KuoEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Leslie RecioIntegrated Laboratory Systems Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Andrew WilliamsEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Carole L YaukEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many regulatory agencies are exploring ways to integrate toxicogenomic data into their chemical risk assessments. The major challenge lies in determining how to distill the complex data produced by high-content, multi-dose gene expression studies into quantitative information. It has been proposed that benchmark dose (BMD) values derived from toxicogenomics data be used as point of departure (PoD) values in chemical risk assessments. However, there is limited information regarding which genomics platforms are most suitable and how to select appropriate PoD values. In this study, we compared BMD values modeled from RNA sequencing-, microarray-, and qPCR-derived gene expression data from a single study, and explored multiple approaches for selecting a single PoD from these data. The strategies evaluated include several that do not require prior mechanistic knowledge of the compound for selection of the PoD, thus providing approaches for assessing data-poor chemicals. We used RNA extracted from the livers of female mice exposed to non-carcinogenic (0, 2 mg/kg/day, mkd) and carcinogenic (4, 8 mkd) doses of furan for 21 days. We show that transcriptional BMD values were consistent across technologies and highly predictive of the two-year cancer bioassay-based PoD. We also demonstrate that filtering data based on statistically significant changes in gene expression prior to BMD modeling creates more conservative BMD values. Taken together, this case study on mice exposed to furan demonstrates that high-content toxicogenomics studies produce robust data for BMD modelling that are minimally affected by inter-technology variability and highly predictive of cancer-based PoD doses.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugAnimalsBenchmarkingCarcinogensFemaleFuransGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenomicsLiverMice, Inbred StrainsModels, TheoreticalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymerase Chain ReactionRisk AssessmentSequence Analysis, RNACarcinogensfuranFurans

Identifiers

PMID26313361
PMCPMC4551741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.