Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26313324›Full record

ArticleChest2015

Who Gets Early Tracheostomy?: Evidence of Unequal Treatment at 185 Academic Medical Centers.

Joshua J Shaw, Heena P Santry

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Critically Injured Burn Survivors: A National, Multi-Database Analysis.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predicting Tracheostomy Need on Admission to the Intensive Care Unit-A Multicenter Machine Learning Analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Comparison of Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in the Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Critically ill Patients.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua J ShawDepartment of Surgery and the Center for Outcomes Research-Surgical Research Scholars Program, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Heena P SantryDepartment of Surgery and the Center for Outcomes Research-Surgical Research Scholars Program, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA. Electronic address: heena.santry@umassmemorial.org.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCEUL1RR031982 · NCRR · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SULLIVAN, JOHN LEWIS · 2010 to 2011
$6.8M
University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2TR000160 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LUZURIAGA, KATHERINE F · 2012 to 2014
$1.7M
University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2RR031981 · NCRR · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SULLIVAN, JOHN LEWIS · 2010 to 2011
$1.2M
A New Specialty Responding To National Needs: Does Acute Care Surgery Deliver?R01HS022694 · AHRQ · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SANTRY, HEENA PRAVIN · 2014 to 2014
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022694AHRQ HHS R01HS22694NCATS NIH HHS 8KL2TR000160-03NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000160NCRR NIH HHS 1KL2RR031981-01NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR031981NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031982NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR031982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the benefits of early tracheostomy in patients dependent on ventilators are well established, the reasons for variation in time from intubation to tracheostomy remain unclear. We identified clinical and demographic disparities in time to tracheostomy.

methodsWe performed a level 3 retrospective prognostic study by querying the University HealthSystem Consortium (2007-2010) for adult patients receiving a tracheostomy after initial intubation. Time to tracheostomy was designated early (< 7 days) or late (> 10 days). Cohorts were stratified by time to tracheostomy and compared using univariate tests of association and multivariable adjusted models.

resultsA total of 49,191 patients underwent tracheostomy after initial intubation: 42% early (n = 21,029) and 58% late (n = 28,162). On both univariate and multivariable analyses, women, blacks, Hispanics, and patients receiving Medicaid were less likely to receive an early tracheostomy. Patients in the early group also experienced lower rates of mortality (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88).

conclusionsEarly tracheostomy was associated with increased survival. Yet, there were still significant disparities in time to tracheostomy according to sex, race, and type of insurance. Application of evidence-based algorithms for tracheostomy may reduce unequal treatment and improve overall mortality rates. Additional research into this apparent bias in referral/rendering of tracheostomy is needed.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersCritical IllnessFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTracheostomyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26313324
PMCPMC4631039
OpenAlexW1930196338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.