Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26313268›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2016

Effects of UGT1A1 genotype on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicities of belinostat administered by 48-hour continuous infusion in patients with cancer.

Andrew K L Goey, Tristan M Sissung, Cody J Peer, Jane B Trepel, Min-Jung Lee, Yusuke Tomita, Sheryl Ehrlich, Christine Bryla, Sanjeeve Balasubramaniam, Richard Piekarz and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Clinical Implications ofPharmaceutics · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Defining Clinical Utility of Germline Indicators of Toxicity Risk: A Perspective.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Cancers · 2021
    Review
  15. Sources of Interindividual Variability.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew K L GoeyClinical Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Tristan M SissungMolecular Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Cody J PeerClinical Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jane B TrepelDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Min-Jung LeeDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Yusuke TomitaDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sheryl EhrlichMolecular Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christine BrylaMedical Oncology Service, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sanjeeve BalasubramaniamMedical Oncology Service, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Richard PiekarzCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Seth M SteinbergBiostatistics and Data Management Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Susan E BatesMedical Oncology Service, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
William D FiggClinical Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Sample Processing and Analytical Methods Development for New Anticancer AgentsZICSC006536 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2025
$18.1M
Using Clinical Pharmacology Principles to Develop New Anticancer TherapiesZICSC006537 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2025
$14.4M
Clinical PharmacogeneticsZIABC010627 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2025
$13.9M
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Anticancer AgentsZICBC010548 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FIGG, WILLIAM DOUGLAS · 2009 to 2018
$5.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat is eliminated through glucuronidation by UGT1A1. Polymorphisms that reduce UGT1A1 function could result in increased belinostat exposure and toxicities. We wanted to determine which single-nucleotide polymorphisms alter belinostat exposure and toxicity. In a phase 1 trial (belinostat over 48 hours in combination with cisplatin and etoposide), belinostat (400, 500, 600, or 800 mg/m(2) /24 h, 48-hour continuous infusion) was administered to patients with cancer in combination with cisplatin and etoposide (n = 25). Patients were genotyped for UGT1A1 variants associated with reduced function: UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*28, and UGT1A1*60. End points were associations between UGT1A1 genotype and belinostat pharmacokinetics (PK), toxicities, and global protein lysine acetylation (AcK). Belinostat AUC was increased (P = .003), and t1/2 increased (P = .0009) in UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*60 carriers who received more than 400 mg/m(2) /24 h. The incidence of grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia (P = .0081) was associated with UGT1A1 polymorphisms. The US Food and Drug Administration-approved package insert recommends dose adjustment of belinostat for UGT1A1*28. However, our data suggest dose adjustment is also necessary for UGT1A1*60. UGT1A1 polymorphisms were associated with increased systemic belinostat exposure, increased AcK, and increased incidence of toxicities, particularly at doses > 400 mg/m(2) /24 h.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveCisplatinEtoposideFemaleGenotypeGlucuronosyltransferaseHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansHydroxamic AcidsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSulfonamidesbelinostatCisplatinEtoposideGlucuronosyltransferaseHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsSulfonamidesUGT1A1 EnzymebelinostatpharmacodynamicspharmacogenomicspharmacokineticsUGT1A1

Identifiers

PMID26313268
PMCPMC6361127
OpenAlexW1927463835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.